What is Racial Profiling?

Article Details
  • Written By: wiseGEEK Writer
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 20 September 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The world's largest maze is constructed out of 200,000 bamboo plants; it covers 17 acres (7 ha) near Parma, Italy.  more...

September 24 ,  1996 :  Major nuclear powers around the world signed the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.  more...

Racial profiling is the consideration of race early on in criminal investigations. If a member of a race is considered more likely to be involved in criminal behavior due to his race, he may be more often suspected of committing crimes, even when no evidence exists to justify this supposition. One of the most common cases of racial profiling in places like the US is the term, “driving while black” or DWB. In this instance, a person of African American descent may be subject to more scrutiny by police officers purely based on race. Innocent people who are pulled over by cops, for no other reason than because they are black are said to have committed the “DWB crime.”

In many countries, racial profiling is illegal. This doesn’t mean it’s nonexistent. There are numerous incidences of people of certain racial or ethnic groups being automatically suspected of crimes based on race. Unfortunately, racial profiling often contains false assumptions about people of races or ethnic groups. It might be assumed that African Americans are more likely to be drug users, which to a police officer might justify stopping more black drivers. Actually, this assumption is false, and there are many more Caucasian drug users than African Americans.


Another assumption directed at certain ethnic groups includes the fear that Arab Americans are more likely to be terrorists. Since 9/11, heightened fear about another terrorist attack has led to some law enforcement officials and organizations using Arab ethnicity to rule in the possibility that someone might be a terrorist. The fact that most Arab Americans are not terrorists makes this type of racial profiling suspect.

The trouble with racial profiling as a whole is that even if a racial or ethnic group is more likely to be involved in certain crimes, most justice systems are based on the rights of the individual. An individual cannot be considered suspicious simply because of race or ethnicity, and the legal system in places like the US depends upon gathering proof in order to convict someone of a crime. Racial or ethnic identity is not proof of criminal behavior, and shouldn’t be considered as a factor in those suspected of crimes. Some believe racial profiling is merely an extension of old racist and ethnocentric behavior that exists in law enforcement and justice agencies.

There are some people who argue that certain types of racial profiling makes sense. When investigators try to find a person suspected of a crime, they may try to identify race of that person in order to narrow down an investigation. Serial killers, for instance, are predominantly Caucasian males, and knowing this might help eliminate suspects. On the other hand, attachment to any racial stereotype may eliminate suspects who aren’t “typically” suspected of certain crimes. This might lead to investigation of the wrong people or ruling out people who have committed crimes but don’t fit stereotypes.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 7

If you don't like someone, there's no need to stay with him or her. It's simple.

Post 6

Racial profiling is a way people can say this race is better than that race when we are all equal.

Post 4

@anon91521: There are two types of racial profiling: Soft profiling and hard profiling. Soft profiling is when police used evidence they gather from witnesses to narrow down possible suspects. The example of the black robber you used is an example of soft profiling.

Hard profiling, however, is illegal. Hard profiling is accusing someone of a crime solely based on their race without any evidence.

Post 3

This article is okay but can't encompass the complexities of this issue. It is politically correct to say that racial profiling is bad. But in the real world profiling occurs everyday and is an effective tool -- even racial profiling.

What I mean by that is, if a bank robbery were to occur committed by a black person, police use that information and look for black suspects, not white ones. That, in effect, is racial profiling. Is that a bad thing or is it merely common sense?

Profiling or racial profiling is only negative when used oppressively against a group of people based on misconceptions.

Post 2

who wrote this?

Moderator's reply: The author is Tricia Ellis-Christensen. wiseGEEK articles have the author's name at the bottom of every page. Thank you for visiting wiseGEEK.

Post 1

Behaviors that are typically associated with certain ethnicity can be profiled in order to establish a criminal profile, such as the typically black behavior of extending a fist to touch another fist instead of shaking hands.

Is is racist to seek a criminal suspect based upon a common ethnic, or racial, custom? If more blacks than whites, or Hispanics than Middle Eastern people portray certain characteristics that are racially distinguishable, then why can't these behaviors be used to apprehend and arrest perpetrators of crimes?

Racial profiling involves behaviors associated with race, not skin colors.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?