What is the Difference Between an Atheist and an Agnostic?

define

The primary difference between an atheist and an agnostic is that the atheist does not believe God or gods exist whereas the agnostic is not sure either way because existence of God or gods, they say, cannot be proven. The atheist may be a weak atheist or strong atheist. The weak atheist may say, “I’m not sure whether gods exist so I don’t worship any. “ The strong atheist comments: “There is no God or gods.”

Some people use the terms of atheist or agnostic interchangeably. How much difference is there, really between a weak atheist and an agnostic? Actually there is some difference. The atheist, whether weak or strong, is not in search of spiritual meaning through finding proof of a god. The agnostic may, on the other hand, be looking for proof, or may be open to the proofs or faith people use to define god. The agnostic does not necessarily rule out that faith might come to him or her at some future point.

The atheist on the other hand, completely discounts the concept of being converted to a belief in god. Even if the atheist is weak, he or she does not choose ever to worship any sort of god. This does not mean that all atheists will stay atheists for life, but many do.

One of the principle arguments for atheism is that a God cannot possibly exist. How could an all powerful being allow for the evils occurring on earth, such as genocide? Why would an all powerful being ignore the many cries for help he or she hears from the faithful?

Most people who believe in God argue that praying does not mean one is guaranteed an answer to one’s prayers. Further, God’s ways are mysterious and above the understanding of humans, thus we cannot fully understand why God would adopt a laissez-faire policy in the world.

The agnostic might ask the same questions as the atheist, but might occasionally evaluate the mysterious ways in which a god or gods might move. The agnostic might also have a tentative belief in an intelligent presence, but believe religions get caught up in doctrine, and have failed to clearly define such a presence. A statement from an agnostic again might be “Sometimes I think there may be something out there, but I’m not sure what it is.”

Thus the main differences between an atheist and an agnostic relates to openness to the question as to whether God exists. The agnostic looks for proof, or a transforming experience of faith. The atheist, on the other hand, refuses to pay homage to any god, either because he or she believes no god exists.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


6
This article paints something of a clear description but shows a definite bias against atheism. It uses words like "openness" as it relates to agnosticism and "refuse" as it relates to atheism. If the writer were truly unbiased it would use no negative verbiage for either.

Let me guess: the writer was a Christian?

- anon49906
5
God breaks his own commandments. He murders constantly in the old testament and He committed adultery when he made Mary pregnant.
- anon37809
4
I don't quite understand why the article focuses so much on the problem of evil.

This seems to be more a problem for theologians.

It is certainly true that the idea of a loving god is logically much harder to justify than a hateful or malicious god.

Though an atheist by definition doesn't face this problem since he doesn't believe in a god, neither a good nor an evil one.

Why not just say that an atheist is a person who doesn't accept claims about the nature of the universe (especially extraordinary claims like a god) on faith but rather requires evidence?

Since there is no evidence and the claim is very unlikely the atheist sees no reason to believe the claim.

An agnostic on the other hand simply admits (depending on the form of agnosticism) his lack or impossibility of knowledge about things like the afterlife and leaves it at that.

- anon33717
3
I'm not an atheist but I am a thinker & I know I'm gonna catch hell for this but; if God is loving even sent his son to die for our sins then why doesn't he forgive Lucifer isn't this breaking one of the commandments?
- normanrp
2
"One of the principle arguments for atheism is that a God cannot possibly exist. How could an all powerful being allow for the evils occurring on earth, such as genocide?"

That would be an argument against a loving god. But is not the reason an atheist would give for her unbelief.

The main argument an atheist has (which goes back to the philosopher Hume) is that god is an inelegant hypothesis, because it is a prime mover that can't explain it's own existence and is therefore no real explanation for anything.

By Occam's razor this hypothesis can therefore be safely dropped.

Also the reason why an atheist doesn't take a "transforming experience of faith" into account is because (s)he believes that personal experiences should not have more weight than objective evidence.

An atheist would change her mind if there were evidence for a religious claim. For example if we could actually see in a microscope a difference between a host that has been "transformed" by the priest and one that hasn't.

- anon27696
1
Am i an agnostic then because this article shows that i am both a little atheist and a little agnostic help please!!!!
- anon21773

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Tricia Ellis-Christensen
Last Modified: 23 October 2009

copyright © 2003 - 2009
conjecture corporation