What Was the Boston Massacre?

Article Details
  • Written By: wiseGEEK Writer
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 07 October 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Fr. Thomas Byles, who refused to leave the sinking Titanic and stayed to help others, is a candidate for sainthood.  more...

October 21 ,  1879 :  Thomas Edison lit up a light bulb for the first time.  more...

The Boston Massacre is an important event in American history, which led up to the Revolutionary War. It has been thought of as one of the primary conflicts that enraged many colonists into considering rejecting Britain’s sovereignty, even though five years exist between the Boston Massacre and the official start of the war. The event refers to the 5 March 1770 conflict between colonists and British soldiers.

An angry mob, mostly protesting the Townshend Acts, gathered in front of the Old State House, which contained the Royal Governor’s council chamber. Colonists were also enraged at the increasing number of soldiers flooding into the colonies, and especially the fact that many soldiers were working for extremely low prices during the day, which cut out available jobs for colony residents. Resentment between colonists and the British Army was considerable, and insults were soon traded between soldiers sent to the Old State House to protect it, and the colonists.

One private, Hugh White, became overwhelmed and struck a young boy, Patrick Garrick, on the head with his musket. This further enraged the crowd and more people joined the fray. Eventually, the crowd of about 300-400 people was so daunting, British officers fired on the colonists, immediately killing three people, Crispus Attucks, Samuel Gray, and James Caldwell. Two more died from injuries sustained and in total eleven people were injured.


Ironically, at the time the “Boston Massacre” was occurring, Parliament had just voted to repeal the majority of the Townshend Acts, keeping only the tax on tea. Taxes on most other imports had been removed, and what was considered the most insulting portion of the Acts, the ability through writs of assistance to search any dwelling, land, or building suspected of containing smuggled goods was scrapped. Without means of direct communication with Britain, there was, of course, no way for anyone in the colonies to know of the repealed laws.

The Boston Massacre became the official title of the altercation, especially in newspapers reporting the attack and by those who were becoming increasingly tired of British rule. In a sense, the word Massacre was certainly hyperbole and newspapers screamed headlines of a massacre implying huge acts of violence for little cause. Truly, the violence, though murder can never be underestimated, was minimal given what the soldiers perceived as an imminent threat to their lives. The soldiers who fired were arrested and tried, but it’s also important to remember that a jury did not convict them, since the jury found the soldiers were justified in their actions.

Historians point to the Boston Massacre as an important turning point on the road to the American Revolution. It angered the people, creating in many a desire to rid the country of British rule. This anger was inflamed by accounts in newspapers, which labeled the incident a massacre, implying the slaughter of innocents, who in no way were responsible for the events. In defense of the soldiers, an angry mob hurling insults is always a frightening thing, and the soldiers had first tried to avoid conflict, before the blow to Garrick was struck.

Given the importance of the incident in leading to the Revolution, the Boston Massacre is reenacted yearly by The Bostonian Society. The reenactment takes place in the same location, at the front of Old State House. The building itself has become a popular tourist site and is a historical landmark on the Freedom Trail.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 26

When the average man has had enough of government control, he will stand up. It's not the elitist, the politician or the rich. What side would you have been on?

Post 22

This started because the colonists were throwing rocks and calling the soldiers names. The colonists actually are the cause of the Boston massacre because the fact is the taxes should not have caused any problems at all. In reality, the taxes were being lowered instead of raised.

Post 16

The british people were short on money due to wars. They needed money back and all this time they were giving free security to the colonists. So eventually, they had to find some way of getting money.

In a way, they were only getting money back. It was either kill them or be killed. Although hitting Patrick Garrick was a stupid mistake which caused deaths.

Post 13

I love how they fought altogether in what they believed in. Sheesh, they should've known taxing doesn't solve problems -- it just makes matters worse as well as increasing deaths. Poor british people should have known better.

Post 12

yeah, it was pretty sad. if i lived back then i wouldn't know what to do.

Post 11

The taxes were extremely unfair! They had the right to protest.

Post 8

I wonder how it started because their are so many answers?

Post 6

wow this is just stupid. why did this happen so fast? I did not get it. is it just because of stupid taxes?

Post 5

I admit this is very sad, but i have seen sadder, like the holacost, 6 million jews dead just like that. Now that is sad.

Post 3

it is weird, too.

Post 2

i wonder why did this all start in the first place.

Post 1

yo that's sad

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?