What is the Davis-Bacon Act?

Article Details
  • Written By: wiseGEEK Writer
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 08 October 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
People with auto-brewery syndrome convert carbs into ethanol in their gut, becoming drunk without drinking alcohol.  more...

November 13 ,  1956 :  The US Supreme Court upheld a decision that ended public bus segregation in Montgomery, Alabama.  more...

The Davis-Bacon Act is a federal law enacted by the US government in 1931. In brief, the law forbids paying workers on public works projects less than the prevailing wage. Many of the public works construction projects are bid on by private companies who then perform the work, but underbidding by lowering employee wages can create an inequitable situation. Essentially, the Davis-Bacon Act attempted to correct this by demanding that all employees must be paid a prevailing wage, and this can be defined as a wage that would be average and expected in the same area for the same type of work.

Senator Jim Davis and Representative Robert L. Bacon sponsored the bill, and it may have been a partial response to anger created when workers from Alabama were hired to build a hospital in New York. Due to the fact that Alabama wages were generally lower than New York wages, the company with the successful bid was able to significantly lower its bid by paying the Alabamans, who were African Americans, much lower wages. Thus in part, the act sought to protect the rights for local workers to find jobs by demanding prevailing wages. This meant it wasn’t okay to pay an Alabaman salary for a New York job and little incentive existed to hire workers elsewhere for jobs that could be completed by local workers.


There is another concern and criticism of the Davis-Bacon Act that has persisted. It has been thought by some people to be a Jim Crow law. African American companies might have had an advantage of being able to underbid competitors for public works projects because their employees were generally paid less. Once the act passed, this advantage was removed because any companies bidding had to pay prevailing wage.

The most altruistic interpretation of the Davis-Bacon Act, and one taken by Judge William D. Bryant in 2002, is simply that the act aimed to employ local workers at fair wages in an era when unemployment was high. After the Great Depression, about 25% of working Americans were unemployed. Having a chance to make fair wages locally was a benefit to the worker. Nevertheless, criticism of the act continues, and there have been attempts to repeal the act and notable suspensions of the act during certain crises.

A few presidents have needed to suspend the act for short periods of time. President George H. W. Bush and President George W. Bush both suspended these regulations after massive hurricanes, as a means of more quickly rebuilding damaged areas at lower prices. President Nixon also suspended the Davis-Bacon Act to reduce inflation but this angered then Labor Secretary Peter J. Brennan, and Nixon reversed his decision in less than a month.

A few amendments to the Davis-Bacon Act have occurred over the years. Some of these allowed for fringe benefits to be counted as part of prevailing wage, and others expanded the terms under which the act could be applied. For example, in the 1990s, one addition was that construction work on Head Start buildings should fall under the act’s provisions.

Efforts to repeal the Davis-Bacon Act are common and tend to primarily come from members of the Republican Party. Pro-union sentiment in the act often runs contrary to the Republican platform. Not all Republicans oppose the act, though, and not all Democrats support it.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 3

There are a lot of parts of this article that bothered me regarding the Davis-Bacon Act, but what bothered me most was the part where it talks about how the act has been suspended from time to time by certain presidents.

You can't have your cake and eat it, too. Either this is a rule we are going to follow or we need to get rid of it all together. What does it say about a law that it can be dismissed when someone in a high position thinks it is getting in the way? To me, this says that the law isn't worth very much to start with.

I couldn't care less one way or the other about the act as far as it affects me, but I don't like when government decides when it should be used and when it shouldn't.

Post 2

@Drentel - I agree that this is a controversial act. I also wonder whether the Davis-Bacon Act was really an attempt to protect workers and make certain they were paid proper wages. Or was this act just a way for established companies to prevent up-start smaller companies from coming in and getting jobs the bigger companies wanted?

Of course, I have no way of knowing one way or the other, but that is something that I think about.

Post 1

This seems to be an instance where the Davis-Bacon Act may have been enacted with good intentions, but the outcome has not been all good. I operate a small business, and I appreciate the opportunity to bid on all types of jobs, including public works projects. However, I don't think the government should get into how I run my business.

If my workers are willing to work for the wages I offer them then the government should have no say in the matter. If my workers have to take a pay cut in order for us to get a contract then most of them would tell you that a pay cut is better than no pay at all.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?