What Is Socio-Economic Analysis?

Article Details
  • Written By: Terry Masters
  • Edited By: Shereen Skola
  • Last Modified Date: 22 October 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
In 2008, Mike Merrill became the first publicly traded person, allowing shareholders to control his life decisions.  more...

October 23 ,  1983 :  Suicide bombers killed nearly 300 US and French military troops in Beirut.  more...

Socio-economic analysis is an umbrella term for theories that marry economic factors with impacts on human sociology. At its crux, socio-economic analysis uses economic inputs to drive social change. It is a type of analysis that is commonly used to structure community development programs.

Figuring out why people act as they do and prompting them to change their behavior is typically the purview of the social sciences, like sociology. Sociology drives human services occupations, such as social workers or case workers, and the programs these workers run. These social science positions interact with a community on a needs basis. Often, their jobs are to identify and direct people to programs and services that can fulfill their needs.

Interacting with communities on a needs basis is grounded in the notion of social welfare and the burgeoning role of governments in providing support and benefits to people who cannot meet their own basic needs. Welfare programming goes in an out of favor with the political winds, however. New paradigms have emerged in an attempt to stabilize support for work being done to alleviate poverty that emphasize building social capital, or internal competencies, rather than what can be perceived as providing handouts. Socio-economic analysis is one of those paradigms that tries to impose a different construct on behaviors and conditions that lead to poverty.


International economic development is, perhaps, the best example of the use of socio-economic analysis. Historically, economic development in third world countries consisted of providing monetary assistance to governments or funding government-identified economic projects, such as building roads. Often, these measures had little affect on the conditions of families at the local level, and, in some instances, has a detrimental impact. Resources that were identified as critical by governments often never made it into the hands of local communities, and economic development projects sometimes led to further community disruption or dispersal.

Socio-economic analysis imposes a different method of identifying and addressing community needs. Instead of inserting help at the top in hopes that it trickles down, socio-economic programming empowers a community to identify its own needs and uses economic inputs to address those needs. So, instead of giving a community a handout, socio-economic programming provides education, job training, access to capital and markets and other benefits that are tied to economic indicators such as educational attainment and small-business development.

It is also easier to measure the success of social programming when it is designed in economic terms. Basic needs-based sociology can only make subjective measurements, based on a person's claim that a benefit was put to its intended purpose and served as a ameliorating supplement. Using economic inputs, on the other hand, means that a program can quantitatively measure actual change, such as how many people attained a certain level of education.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 3

I think that we need a little bit of both-- social development and economic development. It's probably not possible to encourage one without the other. This type of analysis is very interesting though, and it's applicable and useful for so many different fields.

Post 2

We could look at the issue of socio-economic analysis in a different way and say that social development leads to economic development. For example, the richest European countries today are the ones that had the highest rate of development hundreds of years ago. So maybe we need to think of social development as the input instead of capital.

Post 1

Socio-economic analysis theories are widely used by governments and institutions across the globe. But I think that there are some shortcomings of these theories. Economic factors definitely have a lot to do with social change. But I don't agree with the idea that money can always be used to change people's minds.

This is actually a controversial issue and is often discussed in regards to American development programs in other countries such as Afghanistan. It was once thought that if people are given money to run certain social programs that benefit society, their worldview will change. Some people in government and in non-governmental organizations still believe in this and defend this theory. Others argue that money does not

affect ideology. The fact that people are happy to receive money and participate in programs that benefit them does not mean that they favor the ideologies of the investor. I think I agree with this latter opinion.

I think that improved economic conditions may contribute to social change but there is no guarantee that they will. I think it's a hit or miss. But when the issue is the investment of millions, in fact, billions of dollars of tax payer money, perhaps this risk shouldn't be taken.

What does everyone here think about this? Do you agree?

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?