What Is Chekhov's Gun?

Article Details
  • Written By: Lee Johnson
  • Edited By: John Allen
  • Last Modified Date: 21 February 2020
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Research suggests that Alaska's last woolly mammoths died out 5,600 years ago after running out of drinking water.  more...

March 30 ,  1981 :  US President Ronald Reagan was shot.  more...

Chekhov’s gun is a literary technique in which any object given a special significance within a story has to be used at some later point. The technique comes from Anton Chekhov, who explained that a pistol hung on a wall in the first act of the play should be used at some time later in the story. If the gun isn’t used, then it serves no purpose and is a mere distraction — unless it is meant to be a red herring. The ideal situation for Chekhov’s gun is one in which the object is noted but partially forgotten in the first instance, and then becomes relevant later in the story.

The biggest misconception about Chekhov’s gun is that it is equivalent to foreshadowing. Foreshadowing is where the writer leaves little clues about future events in the narrative, which are more clearly understood after the event is known. Chekhov’s gun relates more to removing extraneous information and descriptions than layering clues in for the reader. If a loaded gun is described in the first act and never fired, there is no need to describe the gun at all, because it is irrelevant.


Another key point is that Chekhov’s gun does not relate to guns specifically. Instead, the technique relates to any object within a story which is given special significance, so that the audience would expect it to serve some function. For example, a character may discover a key on a chain early in the story, and later find that it opens the door to a forgotten treasure. The gun referred to is merely figurative, referring to an object which is “loaded” with significance. The audience would be understandably disappointed if the key in the example was never referred to again or was useless.

Red herrings are plot devices which can be related to Chekhov’s gun. In the same way as a “loaded gun,” a red herring is introduced and given some significance early in a story. This prompts the reader to assume it will have importance later on, but in fact, it only serves as a diversion. Red herrings are in some ways the opposite of Chekhov’s gun, being something given significance which isn’t directly significant. The real significance of a red herring is that it distracts the audience from the true plot of the story, and therefore does serve a purpose in some sense.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 3

I think the principle of Chekhov's gun is good advice for writers but they must also caution against being too spare. Some of my favorite writing is full of flourishes and extraneous details that really contribute nothing to the characters or story but create color.

I am think mostly about Gabriel Garcia Marquez. His writing is full of guns that never get fired but that give his novels a lush full feeling that cannot be described to those who have never read his work. I'm sure that Chekhov would have cut hundreds of words, phrases ans sentences out of Marquez's writing but I am glad they are still there.

Post 2

It is a shame that for a lot of people they know the concept of Chekhov's gun more than they know Chekhov's work. He was one of the finest short story writers of all time and wrote at least 3 classic plays. On top of that he was a doctor and a prominent Russian intellectual. He was one of the brightest and most creative minds of the last 200 years and yet his work does not get widely read or taught.

It is a shame. I am a writer myself and Chekhov has been one of my biggest inspirations since I was a teenager. Reading his stories is like having a curtain pulled back and seeing the world revealed to you in a way that you never knew existed.

Post 1

I think the best and also probably most literal example of Checkov's gun is in Henrik Ibsen's play Hedda Gabler. Most of the play is set in the living room of a home and there is a gun on the wall from the very first scene. Many productions choose to emphasize the gun making it a prominent part of the set.

Well in the final scene (spoiler alert) someone pulls the gun off the wall and uses to kill themselves in a very dramatic fashion. Even the first time I saw the play I knew that the gun was going to be used but the ending still comes as a huge shock. It is a great play for anyone that hasn't seen it.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?