What is a Leveraged Buyout?

Brendan McGuigan

A leveraged buyout is a tactic through which control of a corporation is acquired by buying up a majority of their stock using borrowed money. It may also be referred to as a hostile takeover, a highly-leveraged transaction, or a bootstrap transaction. Once control is acquired, the company is often made private, so that the new owners have more leeway to do what they want with it. This may involve splitting up the corporation and selling the pieces of it for a high profit, or liquidating its assets and dissolving the corporation itself.

The Gibson Greeting Cards company was an example of a successful leveraged buyout.
The Gibson Greeting Cards company was an example of a successful leveraged buyout.

The concept of the leveraged buyout originated sometime in the late 1960s, and for the first decade of its existence, it remained relatively obscure and quiet. In the 1980s, Congress began examining the practice closely for legislation, and the media devoted an enormous amount of attention to high-profile cases. By the late 1990s, it was declared that the tactic was a dead one. With the advent of the "New Economy" and seemingly never-ending highs for the market, it appeared that this type of buyout would remain a historical artifact. Since the dot-com collapse, however, the tactics appear to be making a comeback, albeit in a slightly revised format.

The leveraged buyout of the Nabisco corporation is addressed in the book Barbarians at the Gate.
The leveraged buyout of the Nabisco corporation is addressed in the book Barbarians at the Gate.

Some historic examples of successful leveraged buyouts may help to demonstrate the tactic. In 1982, the company Gibson Greeting Cards was acquired by a financial group headed by Wesray Capital for a purchase price of $80 million US Dollars (USD). The financial group itself put in only $1 million USD, borrowing the rest in junk bonds. Upon acquisition, the group turned Gibson Greeting Cards into a privately held corporation. A year and a half later, in the midst of a bull market, they went public with the company again. The total value of the company at this point was $220 million USD. One of the principle architects of the buyout, William Simon, who had initially invested $330,000 USD, received $66 million USD from the final transaction.

At its peak in 1989, total revenue in transactions for these buyouts was just over $76.6 billion USD. With fairly low risk and the potential for enormous profit, it is not surprising that the strategy was so popular during the ideal market conditions of the 1980s. Perhaps the most popular story of such a buyout is that related in the book Barbarians at the Gate by John Helyar and Bryan Burrough, about the hostile takeover of the Nabisco corporation.

In the wake of the surge of leveraged buyout tactics during the 1980s, a number of precautionary measures were conceived by corporations to make themselves less vulnerable. The most famous of these is the poison pill, a method by which the corporation destroys itself if it is taken over. By ensuring that valuation would fall dramatically in the event of a takeover, corporations remove any incentive for buyout firms to target them.

You might also Like

Readers Also Love

Discussion Comments


This seems to be happening to our company. We were purchased by AEA Investors and made private. All decisions seem to be anti-success and seem to be acting against the interests of our clients and the incentives for our employees.


A leveraged buyout is a fancy term for using lots of debt to buy a company. That debt has interest payments. If the highly indebted company earns less than predicted, there may not be enough money to repay the interest on the debt. The company would then default. The stock holders would lose everything, and the debt holders would fight for what remains.

Generally the LBO is set up so that the acquired company has enough cash to pay the debt for a couple of years. Or better yet, the debt issued has no interest payments, so the company will not default until the total repayment of the debt comes due. This involves issuing zero coupon bonds. Simply put, zero coupon bonds are bonds which don't require interest payments. By pushing the repayment of debt far into the future, the acquired company cannot default, and those owning the highly indebted company can pawn off the indebted company on the stock market through an initial public offering.

The most common reason an LBO goes bust is the excessive leverage used. Any minor problem becomes fatal with enough leverage.

Though to be fair, some people will make lots of money regardless of the outcome. The lawyers, the bankers, and the advisors.


What are the most common issues following a LBO or M&A that lead to a fall in the new merged company?

Post your comments
Forgot password?