What is a Double Homicide?

Article Details
  • Written By: Jessica Ellis
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 14 December 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Preschoolers who enjoy superheroes are more likely to act aggressively, but not to defend their peers from bullies.  more...

January 20 ,  1981 :  Iran released 52 US hostages.  more...

A double homicide is the murder or unlawful death of two victims by one perpetrator. It is typically a description of a circumstance, instead of a formal legal term. A person accused of killing two people will typically be charged with two counts of homicide or murder, rather than with a single charge that combines both deaths.

Homicide is a legal term used to describe the death of one person at the hands of another. Murder is a type of homicide, but homicide may also be a result of negligence, self-defense, or other circumstances. Homicide is not always considered a criminal act and cannot always be prosecuted; there are circumstances in which it may be considered justifiable or excusable. Even double homicide may not always be considered criminal, such as in cases where the perpetrator was having his or her life sincerely threatened by two individuals and killed both out of self defense.

Double homicide, however, is quite frequently linked to murder, love triangles, and criminal intent. Film, television, and books often use double homicide as a plot device or means of increasing drama, but famous examples abound in real life as well. Double homicide court cases often generate considerable media attention because they are frequently considered crimes of passion, in part due to some cases that involve the death of a spouse or romantic partner and his or her purported lover at the hands of a jilted partner.


A double homicide may refer to two victims killed in one location, or two people killed as part of the same action or situation. If a person shoots his or her spouse, then drives over to a supposed lover's house and kills a second victim, this may be considered a double homicide even though the victims were in separate locations. It is important to remember that this generally results in two separate charges, though some regions may have stiffer minimum penalties for a person simultaneously charged with multiple murders.

Double homicide is often linked to murder-suicide situations, in which the perpetrator commits suicide after killing two victims. This may occur due to a realization of the severity of the act, or may be a decision to choose suicide over the possible chance of jail or execution. These unfortunate situations are cause of considerable grief to the families of the victims, as they are prevented from seeking legal justice against the perpetrator.

One interesting legal and ethical debate on the issue concerns how the murder of a pregnant woman can be charged. In a media-frenzied California murder case in 2004, Scott Peterson was found guilty of two murder charges: the first-degree murder of his wife, Laci, and the second-degree murder of their unborn son. The second charge remains an issue of great controversy among legal scholars, as it seems to add life status to fetuses, calling into question the legality of abortion laws.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 2

I read the crime reports in my local newspaper every morning, and sometimes there will be a double homicide, mostly because of drug deals gone wrong or a fight that got out of hand. There was one case where an ex-husband found his ex-wife living with her brother and he forced his way into the house. The brother heard screams and came into the living room just as the ex-husband shot his sister.

The brother tried to force the ex-husband out the door, but the man shot him, too. The ex-husband just sat on the lawn and smoked a cigarette while he waited for the police to arrive.

Post 1

I remember we had a notorious double homicide case in our city a few years ago, and the defendant ended up getting the death penalty. He tried to argue self-defense, but the prosecution argued that only one of the victims had any sort of weapon. If he had only been charged with one homicide, he might have been able to convince a jury that his life was in danger.

Since it was a double murder, however, it was harder to prove the second victim was really a threat. The evidence showed that the second man was shot in the back, meaning he was running away from the shooting. A TV reporter talked to some of the jury members after the trial and they said they understood the man's reasons for the first homicide, but they couldn't ignore the intent for the second shooting.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?