What do Food Stylists do?

Article Details
  • Written By: Mary McMahon
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 11 October 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
U.S. companies first sold energy drinks in the early 1900s; they contained radium, which causes radiation sickness.  more...

October 19 ,  1987 :  The Dow Jones experienced its second-largest percentage drop in history.  more...

Food stylists make food look interesting and appetizing when it is filmed or photographed. Many people have noted that the photographs of food they take at home appear dull, listless, and unappetizing, sometimes even when they have photography skills. Food is a tricky thing to photograph well, and food stylists have a number of tricks up their sleeves to use when arranging and styling food for presentation.

Many food stylists have a background in culinary training, in addition to training in the arts. They must be familiar with food, but also with the demands of photography and film, and the ways in which food can behave when it is photographed. A dish which may look scrumptious in real life can look horrific if it isn't styled correctly, and in fact, many of the photographs of food seen in advertisements feature a surprising number of inedible ingredients.

Food stylists are skilled in the aesthetic presentation of food, creating a specific look and feel with the plating, the background setting, and other elements of the presentation. They are also skilled at extracting desired appearances from the foods they work with. They may enhance color and texture with paint, makeup, and hand tools, create the illusion of beads of dew or a crust of ice, and create the appearance of steam. Food stylists are primarily concerned with aesthetics, not edibility.


A food stylist may use inedible components like wax, wood, plastics, and so forth in the course of styling food, or edible components may be used in new ways. For example, milk can look unappetizing, so a photograph of a cookie balanced on top of a glass of milk might actually use a glass of heavy cream to create a fuller, richer appearance.

Food styling explains why food never comes out looking quite like the photo. With something like a cookbook, the food stylist may try the recipe as is to learn more about it, but he or she will usually tweak the recipe and the presentation of the food when it comes to creating a photograph of the food to use as an illustration. For example, the nicely browned roast turkey used as an illustration in a Thanksgiving cookbook might in real life be raw in the middle, with a crust created with the assistance of a hair dryer and some cosmetics tools.

Food styling for film can be more complicated, as people may need to eat the food. In this case, sometimes carefully styled food is photographed and actors are provided with a substitute to eat. This also allows the crew to address issues such as dietary restrictions; a vegetarian may not agree to eat a slice of ham on set, but will eat a vegetarian substitute which resembles ham. Food stylists and filmmakers also need to be concerned about the number of takes; for example, while people may only see an actor eat one slice of cake in the finished product, an actor might need to eat multiple slices of cake to get the scene right, in which case a rich cake would be inappropriate as the actor would quickly feel ill.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 4

@pleonasm - I don't know if they really have to do all those tricks though. I mean, people on my Facebook feed seem to post photos of delicious looking meals all the time and I'm sure that's because they are about to actually eat a delicious looking meal, rather than because they just spent hours setting up fake food.

Why not just take pictures of authentic food and spend the time on making the food look good? That would make more sense to me.

Post 3

@pastanaga - Most of the time the food that is seen in designer magazines or in advertisements isn't really food the way that we think of it. Food photographers have all kinds of tricks to keep it looking "good" for hours, including using nail polish on bits that are supposed to be shiny and putting toothpicks everywhere to hold things perfectly in place.

I don't actually think this is a terrible thing, although sometimes you'll read articles talking about how it's false advertising. Food doesn't have to necessarily look that great in order to taste great. And photographers have to work long hours under hot lighting which isn't going to be good for food.

It's when they do things like putting all the ingredients in the front of the burger to make it look like there are more than actually exist that I feel it really is being dishonest.

Post 2

My mother works for a school who decided they wanted to make a book of local recipes in order to raise money, so we worked as food stylists for about a week to help them out. It was actually quite fun, especially since we weren't trying to make the photographs completely perfect, so we could eat most of the food afterwards.

Food is usually pretty good looking right after you cook it. It's only when it's been sitting for a while that it starts becoming difficult to photograph I think.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?