What are the Different Methods of Quality Control in Education?

Article Details
  • Written By: Jessica Ellis
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 23 February 2020
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
In 2011, scientists discovered an aquifer miles beneath the Amazon River that is nearly as long and twice as wide.  more...

March 29 ,  1973 :  The last American troops left Vietnam.  more...

Quality Control (QC) is a process undertaken to ensure that the standards and goals of an operation are both realistic and being met. In education, quality control is an important issue, as parents, students, and educators want to ensure that all students receive adequate training for the future. There are many methods of quality control in education, including standardized testing, teaching review, and training.

Education quality control usually begins with the formation of school standards. These may be institution, district, state, or national guidelines that determine what a student should know by the end of each grade. For instance, a quality control standard might require all students to have taken and passed geometry by the tenth grade. Quality control standards also lay out guidelines for the education requirements for teachers, such as possession of a valid teaching credential. Once school standards are set, the overseeing board can implement a cycle of investigation, policy changes and additions, and implementation that ensures that a school meets its standards.


One method of quality control in education is standardized testing. Students in each grade are given a test that measures their aptitude in required subjects, such as spelling, reading comprehension, and mathematics. These tests are often administered by a third party company and do not constitute part of the regular grading process. Standardized tests let school authorities know the level of student education as compared to the existing standard. If an age group or grade is struggling in a particular area of the test, measures may be implemented to improve classes in that area.

Teacher review is another important method of QC in education. In many regions, teachers are periodically observed by quality control experts, colleagues, or school management in order to assess their success at meeting quality standards. In determining a teacher's performance, observers may interview students, examine recent grades given, and judge whether the methods used in the classroom are truly adding to education. Using many different tactics to determine teacher performance level is often considered very important; teachers rated based on standardized testing alone may leave out important areas of learning that cannot be measured by tests.

Listening to student, teacher, and parent feedback is sometimes an important part of quality control in education. Teachers can give a clear picture of how a particular class is struggling or succeeding, while students are often full of valuable information about how teachers manage a classroom and how it could be improved. Paying careful attention to feedback can help create solutions to quality control lapses.

Laws and funded programs are sometimes used to help improve QC in education. Governmental intervention can sometimes try to bridge a quality lapse that is widespread and outside of the jurisdiction of a single school or educational system. One example of government involvement in educational quality control would be a government funded program that provided free nursery school to help prepare young children for an educational environment.

Quality control in education must be an ongoing process; meeting standards one year does not guarantee future performance. By creating a continual process of data gathering, review, and implementation allows school officials to stay on top of quality assurance from year to year. Relying on a variety of methods also helps guarantee that the whole picture of a school or school system is being examined.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 3

@bythewell - Honestly, the real fundamental problem with standardized testing is that it takes time away from education. The last time I was in a classroom the students seemed to be taking a test for evaluation every second day and that was time they could have been spending on actual learning.

I'm all for quality control of education and for transparency, but at some point you've got to stop forcing teachers to spend all their time on reporting and let them do their jobs so they'll have something to report.

Finland is often held up as a paragon of education, with something like 97% of students graduating high school, and they only have one standardized test the whole time students are in the system. Yet somehow they still manage to maintain a very high quality of education.

Post 2

@KoiwiGal - Most reputable schools don't rely entirely on standardized testing, or they have it set up so that they are measuring the progress of individual students against themselves rather than against an average.

I've been evaluated quite often by having someone sit in my classes and listen while I'm teaching and I've had interviews and performance evaluations. It all depends on the school, the wider community standards and the country.

Post 1

The problem with standardized testing as quality control in education is that children don't fit into standards like that. A teacher might be doing extremely well with a particular student, and better than anyone else ever could, but if that student is always going to be below average then they aren't going to reflect well in standardized testing.

That's not even getting into the fact that testing like that doesn't measure important qualities like confidence and creativity. I've had plenty of teachers that shattered my confidence, but my marks didn't really change.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?