How is Uranium Enriched to Make Bombs?

Article Details
  • Written By: Michael Anissimov
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 21 October 2019
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
When hiring new employees, Google no longer looks at most candidates' grade point averages and test scores.  more...

November 18 ,  1978 :  Jim Jones, leader of the Peoples Temple, led more than 900 people in a mass murder-suicide.  more...

Enriched uranium is uranium with a high percentage of the isotope U-235, which only makes up about .72% of natural uranium. Normal uranium is referred to as U-238, where the number signifies the amount of nucleons (protons and neutrons) in its atomic nucleus. U-235 has an uneven quantity of protons and neutrons, making it slightly unstable and susceptible to fissioning (splitting) from thermal neutrons. Getting the fission process to proceed as a chain reaction is the basis of nuclear energy and nuclear weapons.

Because U-235 has identical chemical properties to normal uranium and is only 1.26% lighter, separating the two can be quite a challenge. The processes are usually quite energy-intensive and costly, which is why only a few countries have been able to achieve it an industrial scale thus far. To make reactor-grade uranium, U-235 percentages of 3-4% are required, whereas weapons-grade uranium must consist of 90% U-235 or more. There are at least nine techniques for uranium separation, although some definitely work better than others.

During WWII, the United States, when researchers were first pursuing isotope separation, a series of techniques were used. The first stage consisted of thermal diffusion. By introducing a thin temperature gradient, scientists could coax lighter U-235 particles towards a region of heat, and heavier U-238 molecules towards a colder region. This was just preparation of feed material for the next stage, electromagnetic isotope separation.


Electromagnetic isotope separation involves vaporizing uranium and then ionizing it to produce ions with positive charge. The ionized uranium was then accelerated at bent by a strong magnetic field. Lighter U-235 atoms were deflected slightly more, while U-238 atoms slightly less. By repeating this process many times, uranium could be enriched. This technique was used to make some of the enriched uranium for the Little Boy bomb, which destroyed Hiroshima.

During the Cold War, electromagnetic isotope separation was abandoned in favor of the gaseous diffusion enrichment technique. This approach pushed uranium hexafluoride gas through a semi-permeable membrane, which slightly separated the two isotopes from one another. Like the prior technique, this process would have needed to be performed many times to isolate a substantial amount of U-235.

Modern-day enrichment techniques use centrifuges. The lighter U-235 atoms slightly preferentially pushed towards the outer walls of the centrifuges, concentrating them where they can be extracted. Like all the other techniques, it must be performed many times to work. Full systems that purify uranium in this way utilize many centrifuges and are called centrifuge cascades. The Zippe centrifuge is a more advanced variant on the traditional centrifuge which utilizes heat as well as centrifugal force to separate the isotope.

Other techniques of uranium separation include aerodynamic processes, various methods of laser separation, plasma separation, and a chemical technique, which takes advantage of a very slight difference in the two isotopes' propensity to change valency in oxidation/reduction reactions.


You might also Like


Discuss this Article

Post 3

@Ana1234 - I think it's more of an issue how many nuclear weapons already exist in the world. There are thousands of them still from the arms race and the longer they sit there the more likely it is that the security around them is going to slacken and something will go wrong.

I don't worry about modern uranium enrichment nearly as much as the already existing stockpile of weapons.

Post 2

@Fa5t3r - It's still very difficult to make a nuclear weapon. I'm not saying it's out of the question for a non-government group, or an individual to do it, but it's extremely unlikely because it's expensive and very noticeable.

Even most governments don't have the capacity to do it, at least not without diverting a lot of funding and resources. I mean, there's a reason they can just post an article like this without any kind of worry about the information being misused. TV and the movies make nuclear weapons seem like they are a dime a dozen and a kid scientist could make one in his backyard, but it's just not true.

Post 1

This is one of the issues with having nuclear power stations. Either you end up with a lot of waste radioactive material that needs to be disposed of somewhere (and will remain radioactive for thousands of years) or you can recycle the material into more power.

The problem is that recycling the material might mean you have less of the byproduct waste, but the remaining byproduct is much more easily refined into what is needed for bombs.

That's one of the reasons why Europe has been recycling their nuclear material for years and has less of a dumping problem, but the USA refuses to do it. They don't want to create more of a problem with random groups being able to get their hands on enriched uranium.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?