Why do all Electronics Have to be Turned Off for Takeoff and Landing?

travel entertainment

As the use of personal electronic devices has boomed, so have complaints about restrictions on their use, especially during airplane takeoff and landing. Opponents of these restrictions claim use of devices such as cell phones, particularly, has not been shown definitively to have an affect on any operations of the aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration and other organizations have been taking the “better safe than sorry” approach. Where does the truth lie in this debate?

The most frequently cited reason for turning off electronic devices during takeoff and landing is that these could interfere with the aircraft’s communication and navigation. When approaching Podunk Field, communication might not be such a problem, but when leaving or approaching O’Hare International Airport, for example, a communications failure could prove disastrous on a titanic scale.

Takeoff and landing are, of course, critical times during a flight. Crashes and crises rarely happen when an aircraft is at cruising altitude. If bad things are going to happen, they generally happen during takeoff and landing. The maneuvers required during takeoff and landing require the crew’s undivided attention. They must be in constant communication with the tower, and their instruments must be working correctly to safely land or launch the aircraft, particularly at a busy airport.

Personal electronic devices, especially cell phones and laptop computers with the wireless Internet connection functioning, do emit signals as they operate. Conventional wisdom has dictated these signals are unlikely to affect the digital, shielded systems of modern aircraft during takeoff and landing — but unlikely and impossible are not synonymous. Signals from some electronic devices, such as portable CD players have been known to cause interference in the communications or navigation systems of older, pre-1984 jets. However, airlines routinely keep their jets in service for 20 years or more, so it is definitely possible that a passenger flying today might find himself aboard an older aircraft with less shielding.

Another reason for electronic devices to be turned off during takeoff and landing is that, even though there is little likelihood of a CD player interfering with the aircraft’s operations, flight attendants cannot monitor every single electronic device aboard the aircraft. They do not have the training to ascertain whether an electronic device might be an interfering agent or not. Therefore, the simplest solution is to have all such devices turned off during takeoff and landing.

A 2000 Congressional hearing failed to make a definitive decision on whether electronic devices do, in fact, interfere with an aircraft during takeoff and landing. Since this was the case, the decision was to have all such devices turned off, since that would harm no one, was a free solution, and was known to be a viable alternative. The U.S. government certainly did not want to clear the use of these devices during takeoff and landing and then have the unthinkable happen — a crash caused by interference from a laptop. World governments and airlines have chosen to follow this rationale, in general. Plus, who wants to listen to 300 people talking at full volume on cell phones during a four-hour flight? Sky marshals would have to travel on every flight to prevent passengers from attacking each other.

On average, an aircraft takes about 15-20 minutes to reach 10,000 feet (3.1 kilometers), which is considered cruising altitude. It is not unreasonable to ask passengers to turn off personal electronic devices during the first 20 minutes and last 10 minutes of a flight to ensure the safety of everyone on board the aircraft, and of those in the surrounding skies.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


3
My friend works for Jetstar in Australia (a discount airline owned in part by Qantas). He is the captain or co-pilot for them. He keeps his mobile phone on and in his pocket the entire time while flying.

It is well known that electronic devices pose no threat, however (as always) are cautious "just in case". Secondly, in the case of all electronic devices (legally manufactured or imported), they are tested to operate adequately with EMC emissions and are tested not to put out any unusual EMC emissions. This is the FCC/CE or Ctick certification.

In australia, there is A-tick which is for wireless devices/telecommunication devices. Items are designed not to interfere. If they could, they wouldn't pass the expensive testing process. Lastly, back in the analog days of mobile phones it was possible to make a phone call (hopping towers at considerable speed), however it was impossible to track the caller for billing purposes.

Now, this sounds like total rubbish to me, but, if true, then it could also be a reason why mobile phones were banned. That info came from a Jet star trainer that trained air hostesses. Could be utter garbage, however the first two things I said were true.

- anon64074
2
Incorrect, anon47943 - the article does mention that "Signals from some electronic devices, such as portable CD players have been known to cause interference in the communications or navigation systems of older, pre-1984 jets". There is evidence, even if it's 25 years old.

Your examples are exaggerated, and in the case of elephants, absurd. Remember that most crashes occur on takeoff and landing, and keeping electronic devices off (not just in silent mode) not only ensures that radio waves are kept to a minimum, but means that in the event of an emergency, passengers would be able to actually hear the crew, something that would be rather difficult with earbuds or headphones.

While I agree that interference from electronic devices is unlikely to ever occur, remember that airlines are commercial businesses, and can be sued. They are protecting their own assets - this way, if a crash occurs and it is determine that someone's device is at fault, the airline can say "Hey, we told them to turn it off."

Not the most noble of rules, but a necessary one for running a business.

- anon56025
1
After admitting that there is no evidence that these devices present a risk, the article concludes that "It is not unreasonable" to make us turn them off because it's only for a few minutes. By this logic, I could say that people should refrain from speaking during that same period, or from thinking about elephants. After all, it's not impossible that these things could cause harm, and it's only for a few minutes.
- anon47943

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by A Kaminsky
Last Modified: 05 February 2010

copyright © 2003 - 2010
conjecture corporation