Category: 

Who Was Immanuel Kant?

Article Details
  • Written By: S. Mithra
  • Edited By: L. S. Wynn
  • Last Modified Date: 22 July 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Almost one-third of 18 - 34 year olds in the U.S. live with their parents.   more...

July 31 ,  1991 :  The US and the Soviet Union signed the START - a treaty that would reduce nuclear arms by 35%.  more...

Immanuel Kant wrote philosophical treatises during the Enlightenment that dealt with logic, empirical evidence, sensory input, and epistemology, or how we learn what we know. We can situate his thoughts in an era interested in the scientific method, religion and metaphysics, ethical societies, and rivaling belief systems. Kant responded to Empiricists and Rationalists by asserting his thesis that everything we believe must be filtered through our senses and mind. Thus, truth is determined by how we understand and orient knowledge of an object, regardless of what other "independent" characteristics the object might possess.

During his long life, from 1724-1804, Immanuel Kant made numerous contributions to modern philosophy, developing what he called "transcendental idealism." He spent his entire life in his birthplace of East Prussia, working at the local university, reading contemporary Enlightenment philosophers, and writing treatises in German. He commented on everything from the existence of God to the aesthetics of beauty, as well as examining how entrenched, official bodies of knowledge influence the average person. Always wanting to promote freedom, independence, and equality, his theories encouraged individuals to take responsibility for determining their own truths.

Ad

Kant synthesized the philosophies of two opposing schools of thought to lay the groundwork for transcendental idealism. In many ways, his theories anticipated how 20th century physics understands observation, as well as how neurologists conceive of consciousness today. The Empiricists, especially David Hume, believed that we only can rely on what we know about the world through direct, experiential information, including emotions and frames of reference. However, the Rationalists encouraged logical knowledge that was accumulated, deduced, or concluded from other abstract knowledge, because this was independent from person to person variation.

A direct response to David Hume, Kant wrote The Critique of Pure Reason in 1781. In this seminal work, he argued that we are, by necessity, constrained in our perception of the world. These constraints, or filters, are primarily our senses and the organization of our thoughts as determined by our brain's physiology. We acquire knowledge both organically and abstractly, but the process of acquisition cannot be separated from the knowledge itself.

The constraints of which Kant spoke do not have a negative connotation. They can be thought of as filters, models, language, instruments, consciousness, or the limits of our imagination that structure the tenacity of beliefs. It follows that if there are metaphysical, or supersensory, phenomena, humans do not have access to them. Without arguing that the world is an illusion, Kant still reasons that all its objects are fundamentally unknowable as independent from our involvement in their observation.

Ad

Discuss this Article

anon305113
Post 3

Can someone summarize his important three works? I am doing a presentation and I understand but I don't think I'm sure.

hidingplace
Post 2

@rjh - It's difficult to explain anything by Kant simply, but I think Kant believed that happiness can never be continuous, it always has a beginning and an end. The simplest analogy would be a drug user: they're happy when they have drugs, and unhappy when they're not and this process repeats over and over again.

So to try to interpret that quote, think of it as reason being the likelihood that happiness will be attained and imagination being something that may or may not be attained. I suppose it ties in with his idea of constrained perception.

Maybe someone else could help explain it more eloquently?

rjh
Post 1

I think I have a rough understanding of Kant's ethics and how our perception of the world is constrained, but I'm struggling with his thoughts on happiness. Could someone help explain the Kant quote "Happiness is not an ideal of reason, but of imagination."

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email