Which Has More Holes, the Salt Shaker or the Pepper Shaker?

food cooking

Every once in a while, fate enjoys throwing the old wiseGEEK a curve ball just to make sure he's paying attention. This is one of those times. It turns out that a debate over the proper combination of condiment and shaker has been raging for years, with no definitive answer in sight. Some say that tradition favors a salt shaker over a pepper shaker hole-wise, with many older sets featuring two pepper shaker holes to four salt shaker holes. Others made the ratio a little more balanced, with three holes for the salt shaker and two for the pepper shaker. However, in some countries, such as the UK, it is not unusual to find a salt shaker with only one hole and its pepper shaking partner displaying four or more holes. Clearly, there is no universal standard at work here.

Some say that a salt shaker should have more holes because of its favored status as a spice. Many people tend to shake copious amounts of salt and only sprinkle their food with pepper. Therefore, the salt shaker should have more holes in order to improve the flow, while a pepper shaker should do all right with fewer holes. If only it were that simple, however. Others say that it's not the number of holes that makes a difference, it's the size of said holes. Salt grains are thought to be larger than equivalent ground pepper flakes, so they should be put in a salt shaker with fewer but larger holes. Since ground pepper is lighter and dustier than salt, it requires more holes in order to flow out at a comparable rate.

As if this weren't enough fodder for the controversy cannon, there is the "too much salt is too much" argument. With a number of people who are already on, or perhaps should be on, low sodium diets, many argue that the salt shaker should contain the fewest holes in order to prevent overuse. Many people habitually shake the salt shaker without regard for the actual amount of salt escaping through the holes. Some conscientious family members have even been known to use superglue or other means to reduce the number of available holes in a salt shaker. Pepper, on the other hand, is rarely subjected to these types of dietary restrictions, so it can be safely put in the shaker with the most holes.

Many restaurants use disposable pepper and salt shaker sets in order to reduce the need for periodic cleanings, and these shakers do appear to favor salt over pepper, at least by a hole or two. Some shaker sets spell out the letters "S" and "P" to denote their contents, which appears to level the playing field considerably. Etiquette and household experts also disagree on the standard number of holes in shakers, leaving it up to a user's personal preferences. A number of food experts, however, recommend using a pepper mill in place of a shaker containing pepper of dubious freshness and quality. Some even suggest using a salt mill containing sea salt crystals instead of a salt shaker. While this method may not make you a hero at your local fast food joint or greasy spoon, it does provide an elegant answer to the great salt and pepper shaker debate.

In short, if there are no other indications for the appropriate spice such as labels, initials or color cues, then you should feel free to put whichever spice you prefer in the shaker with the most holes. If you're not happy with the flow, then make the switch. As long as you and yours know which is which, then all should be right with the world, seasonally speaking.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


9
Pepper should only ever be fresh ground at the table, meaning salt shakers win out. Preground pepper goes stale very fast, leaving it with a more dusty taste.
- anon50780
8
Please note that the salt grinders that come prefilled with sea salt are not iodized. --arkibty
- anon40892
7
Yes, I agree with anon8759. In the UK the salt shaker traditionally only has one hole due to the single heap of salt that was placed on the side of plate before eating. (Previous to this is came from little silver tubs with spoons).

My parents and grandparents always utilised this technique. Salt would also be added to the side of the plate before tasting as adding afterwards indicates that the cook (i.e. host) has not added enough. Salt would then be added on a mouthful-by-mouthful basis using the knife.

- anon13186
6
what a nice silly story!

I was taught that salt shakers should have the larger holes to accommodate the larger grains, but not necessarily more holes. Pepper shakers should have smaller holes and not too many, since overdoing the pepper is more destructive to the food than is the salt...i.e., the pepper burns.

I prefer fresh-ground pepper with a companion salter, and not too much of it, since salt is not too good for us, when overdone.

An artist, I never criticize salt and pepper containers...the art, the art... and the importance of good hospitality rules of kindness at the table, any table.

- anon8779
5
i think it's salty because of all the minerals because it is so big that more minerals are in it than fresh water
- maty172
4
my salt shaker has 1 hole while my pepper shaker has 6. the holes are regular size but the salt is bigger. I also have another set that both have 13 holes the same size too. it's all about the company.
- maty172
2
The aristocratic English never sprinkled their food with salt. They put a small heap of salt on the edge of their plates and while eating would prod the salt heap with a fork full of food and then eat it. Hence the British Aristocracy invented the salt cellar with one hole and the rest of the World has been wondering what to do with it ever since! This is not as strange as one might first think because they also invented the fish knife and fork and also the ''shooting stick''. Please ask wisegeek what he knows about the shooting stick. Not being Red İndians they were not referring to Thundersticks or anything like that!
- anon8759

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Michael Pollick
Last Modified: 31 October 2009

copyright © 2003 - 2009
conjecture corporation