What Would Happen if the Polar Ice Caps Melted?

There has been much worry about the possibility that anthropogenic (human-originating) global warming will cause the ice caps to melt and flood our coastal cities. Virtually every metropolitan area with over 10 million people is located on the coast.

Is human industrial activity causing the earth is get warmer? This is certain to some degree, but there are disagreements about the extent to which global warming is anthropogenic or just part of a natural climate cycle. There is a great incentive for people with political or environmental causes to warp the data in a desired direction. There are many on both sides of the divide.

But let's say that global warming is anthropogenic, and it does occur. How much would this cause the ice caps to melt?

Most of the world's ice is in Antarctica. The continent is covered by an ice shelf 2,133 meters (7,000 feet) thick. If the entire ice pack melted, the world's oceans would rise by 61 meters (200 feet). But since the average temperature in Antarctica is -37°C (-35°F), this is very unlikely to happen. More likely is that only a portion of the ice melts, increasing sea levels by a few feet or meters.

The results would still be catastrophic. A rise of a couple meters would flood the streets of many coastal cities, necessitating their evacuation. Low-lying countries such as many in Indonesia could be almost entirely submerged. The new standing water would be ideal for the breeding of mosquitos and other insects, spreading diseases such as malaria.

Much farmland is located at low elevations. If it were flooded by salt water, the crops and land would be ruined and there would be a food availability disaster. Farmers would need to move to more elevated, rocky land, which on average is less suited to growing crops.

What is not possible is that all the world's land would be covered, as in the movie Waterworld. There is simply not enough ice on earth for this to happen. Even in a severe flood, only a small percentage of the world's land would be lost - but of course this could translate to millions of square miles or kilometers.

To avoid global warming, world leaders have come up with a variety of strategies to encourage reduced emissions of CO2, which is said to be the main cause of anthropogenic warming. Emission limits for various countries have been willfully accepted. A long-term strategy is to exploit alternatives to fossil fuels, which are rampant polluters.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


13
Water melts at 32 degrees F or above. It never gets that warm at either pole. The average temperature of the interior region of the Arctic mass is -37 degrees. It is not going to melt. The Arctic ice has increased for the last few years.
- anon65542
12
Your ice in a cup experiment is flawed. A lot of ice is on land, not floating. An accurate ice in a cup experiment would be putting a platform above the water level in the cup and placing the ice on the platform. The platform represents the land that the ice cap is lying on, such as Antarctica, or Greenland.
- anon63226
11
i have tried to express these same theories to all those conspiracy nuts but they all refuse to believe. They all want to believe that everything is going to cause the end of the world so they do not have to feel responsible for foolish beliefs. I say believe what you can see, test the theory for yourself watch the water fall when the ice melts. Also, when you place ice in a glass of water most of the ice is under the water leaving only a fraction above the surface. Why do people refuse to believe their own eyes?
- anon61685
9
If the North Pole melted and the sea were not salty, the net rise in sea level would be zero at 0 degrees Celsius. That’s because the weight of water that is displaced by ice is equal to the weight of the ice.

As the temperature increases to four degrees Celsius, the volume will decrease slightly since water is most dense at that temperature. Warming further, the volume increases well past the volume at zero degrees. The warming of the seas devoid of ice is the source of significant sea level increase. Since the sea is salty, and more dense than fresh water, the level will increase, depending on the local salinity, as the ice melts and the level will continue to increase as before, above 4 degrees C.

So, with all of the money you’re saving by living in your neo-con dream world, maybe I could interest you in some nice beach front property east of Sacramento!

- anon56690
8
But if the ice caps have more water than we have land, then the fact stays that the water would flood the land, and without any land, where would we be then?
- anon55904
7
anon46092: Most of the southern polar ice rests on a massive body of land called the Antarctica continent and thus does not displace ocean water as you would think.
- anon55022
6
But if ice floats and most of it is not in water how does that make it true?
- anon54865
5
The water displacement only happens if the ice cap on the North pole melts, not both.
- anon52434
3
It is a scientific fact that if BOTH ice caps melted completely, the ocean levels would actually decrease. A simple experiment you can do at home will prove this fact. Fill a glass of water half way, then fill the rest of it with ice. Measure the water level in the glass then allow all the ice to melt. The water level goes down. The reason? The amount of water displaced by the ice is actually greater than the amount of water after the ice melts. The amount of ice at both poles is enormous, displacing ocean water. Even if all the land ice melted as well, the runoff would return the ocean to the same level it was before *both* ice caps melted. Simple logic, simply proven, but you won't find these facts anywhere because the Libs want your money.
- anon46092

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Michael Anissimov
Last Modified: 17 March 2010

copyright © 2003 - 2010
conjecture corporation