![]() |
||||||||
What Was The Stamp Act? |
||||||||
The Stamp Act of 1765 will forever be associated with the colonial battle cry of “no taxation without representation.” The use of stamped, embossed paper on legal documents, newspapers and even playing cards were required fare under the stipulations of the Stamp Act. Stamps did not refer to the postage stamps that we know and lick today, but rather, in colonial times, stamps were used in an embossing process. Pressure is applied to the stamp, leaving the imprint of a raised design on different materials. In colonial times, a stamp was used on paper, metal or fabric. The presence of the stamp indicated payment of the imposed tax. Utilizing paper that had been stamped for legal documents was an established practice in England for years, but the American colonists had never heard of such a thing. They were outraged and responded violently to the Stamp Act. The English Parliament passed the Stamp Act in a direct attempt to raise funds for the British military defending the borders of the American colonies. Violators of the law imposed by the Stamp Act were subject to trial in vice-admiralty courts. The concept of the Stamp Act was alien to the early colonists who had up to that time experienced only external and indirect taxation. The Sugar Act of 1764 was a tax on trade but it did not directly affect their lives in the same way as the Stamp Act. It can be said that the agitation stirred by the passage of the Stamp Act sowed the seeds of discontent that some ten years later erupted into the conflict known as the American Revolution. The Stamp Act was not intended or considered to be an act of oppression by many of the luminaries of the day. Even Benjamin Franklin gave his agreement to the tax, albeit not without considerable hesitation. Despite the intentions of the mother country, colonial reaction was intense, adverse and immediate. One of the unexpected effects of the passage of the Stamp Act was the unification of some of the more powerful factions of colonial society, namely: lawyers, clergy, businessmen and journalists. The American colonists did not feel that they were fairly represented in government and their protest of “no taxation without representation” was never legally addressed. The Stamp Act angered them because they saw no need for the army that the proceeds from the Stamp Act were supposed to defray. The colonists stood their ground, and unable to enforce the Stamp Act, the English Parliament was forced to repeal it the following spring. Taxes and discontent swelled until finally, colonial America went to war with the mother country exerting its need for independence in the American Revolution.
Written by
M. Dee Dubroff
|
||||||||
![]() |
home
FAQ
contact
about
testimonials
terms
privacy policy
advertise
| |||||||
|
|