What is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch?

animals environment

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch is considered by some scientists to be a misnomer for the floating pile of garbage approximately the size of Texas which can be found between Oregon and the Hawaiian Islands, since it suggests that the epic amount of garbage may be manageable. Whatever it is called, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch represents an environmental disaster for the world's oceans, and it is often used to illustrate the need for conservation policies which take the ocean into account. When it was sampled in 2001, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch yielded six pounds (three kilograms) of plastic for every pound (half kilogram) of plankton in the water.

The garbage patch formed and continues to exist because of ocean currents. The patch is not actually static in position, sometimes drifting into landmasses which have begun to resemble landfills. It moves with the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, a high pressure zone of air which forces ocean surface currents to move in a slowly clockwise pattern, creating a whirlpool which sucks garbage from other parts of the ocean into the gyre. The high pressure zone is extremely stable, as it is caused by hot air from the equator cooling as it moves northwards. There are several such gyres around the world, and they are traditionally avoided by sailors and fishermen because they are devoid of wind and marine organisms.

The traditional avoidance of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre meant that the garbage slowly collecting there had accumulated immense volume by the time it began to be recognized. Most of the debris in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is made from plastic, which does not biodegrade. Organic material and debris from other sources will eventually break down, but plastics do not, although they do break into smaller and smaller pieces. Greenpeace estimated that approximately 10% of the plastics manufactured every year ultimately end up in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

The environmental risks posed by the Great Pacific Garbage Patch are manifold. To begin with, the area supports minimal marine life, because the garbage patch restricts the limited area of water which photosynthetic organisms can live in. Other marine life including birds, mammals, fish, and jellyfish also suffer because they mistake the garbage for food. The garbage also carries a hidden payload: oily toxins which have accumulated in the plastic floating on the surface of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. These toxins appear to be absorbed and concentrated by the plastics, which are in turn eaten by unwitting animals.

Public awareness about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch was increased in 2006, when a number of feature news articles on the subject were published. Some scientists fear that increased knowledge about the issue may be coming too late, as cleanup of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch may be impossible. The issue does highlight the growing problem of garbage in the world's oceans, and it is hoped that awareness will drive consumers to reduce the amount of garbage they generate, as well as spurring international cooperation to address the problem.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


10
america is being blamed for the garbage patch because it is closest to us. no were not fully responsible and instead of cleaning it up we just blame each other. it's not america that messed up. the entire world is messed up. exampled: WW1 and WW2. soon we'll just blow up everything.
- anon39997
9
For those of you interested in seeing video of the garbage swirl, Faban Cousteau was a guest on the Oprah show on April 22, 2009. He brought a video of the garbage patch as part of the discussion on the day's topic "Earth Day". Scary!
- anon34216
8
No one is blaming just the U.S. for the garbage patch. The garbage accumulates from all over the world, swirling and being passed around by ocean currents until they reach the great pacific garbage patch. There are other garbage patches in just about all the oceans but the one in the pacific is the biggest. Therefore, that one is focused on more. The reason that it is not spotted on google earth or that it is not photographed is because it is not one whole mass. The patch is made up tons of garbage but most of it has been broken to small pieces, it is better understood as a thick soup.
- anon31033
7
i agree with anon15487...although i don't question if it exists or not, i think that if the people of the world saw the evidence of the great pacific garbage patch, it would scare countless numbers into recycling, disposing of trash properly, and finding ways to reduce their ecological footprints! the very thought of this huge island of floating garbage is quite horrifying!
- gnr
6
I'm sure that something like this is real, but why is it not visible on google maps? why has no one ever visited this garbage heap? why is there no photographic/videographic evidence of it? are we too scared to go? what's the deal???
- anon15487
5
I am most intrigued by this garbage patch. It is so interesting that there can exist, in the middle of the ocean, a deposit for our rubbish. We should probably try and breed a type of micro-organism that feeds off plastics, that could be deployed in the area to consume or break down the rubbish. This would find use on landfills as well (on the land). The problem is, the complex polymer structures of plastics are very inorganic and difficult to consume. We must trust our Russian and Taiwanese scientists to continue to develop the micro-organisms, while we can build the boats that will deliver them to the garbage patch. Afterwards, maybe we could split the profits with them or share the prizes that may come. In any case, our foreign relations would improve. The US, Taiwan and Russia will surely strengthen their ties and realise that by introducing micro-organisms into the Pacific Garbage Gyre, there will emerge a new age in international diplomacy and trade relations.
- anon13769
4
The world indeed should stop blaming America for everything wrong with the world. With roughly 5% of the world's population, we make up 22% of the world's productivity while using 25% of the planet's total energy output. Knowing that energy use roughly mirrors GNP and assuming GNP roughly mirrors share of garbage output, and an argument could be made that we actually produce more non-organic garbage than people living in the third world with no access to goods packaged in plastic, we produce garbage at more than six times the average rate of the rest of the world combined.

Lest we get cocky, our American energy consumption level of 11.4 kW per person is almost twice that of Japan and Germany with 6 kW per person. In developing countries such as India the per person energy use is closer to 0.7 kW. Bangladesh has the lowest consumption with 0.2 kW per person.

Using the numbers as benchmarks, it's reasonable to assume we Americans produce twice as much garbage per capita as the Germans and Japanese, and almost 60 times as much as the folks in Bangladesh. And, again, it's likely a higher percentage of ours is inorganic because that's how we live. So, no, we Americans shouldn't be blamed for everything wrong with the world... only for our fair share.

Based on those numbers, by the way, it doesn't seem like we're very good stewards. 25% of consumption should result in at least 25% of total productivity, and more if we're really smarter than the average bear.

- anon13445
3
hmm...this is a terrible problem, that i think is hard for many to comprehend the scope of. another great argument for recycling and against littering. come on people!!! and, no, i don't think the great pacific garbage patch is all arnold schwarzenegger and president bush's fault either. i think the world should stop blaming America for everything wrong with the world!
- gnr
2
i think that people should remove it and arnold Schwarzenegger or the president doesn't care for the people they know its polluting the world they should of not let people do that its wrong people need to take better care of the environment.
- anon11088
1
with all of the philanthropist today has it been suggested that someone look into some sort of subsidy to tow a floating garbage scow out there and work on collecting the garbage from the sea?

I know it seems impractical due to the size but how else is it going to be cleaned up?

- ming4ling

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by S.E. Smith
Last Modified: 05 August 2009

copyright © 2003 - 2009
conjecture corporation