Category: 

What is the Evolutionary History of Fish?

Article Details
  • Written By: Michael Anissimov
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 15 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Contrary to popular belief, monkeys do not eat bananas in the wild because the banana is a cultivated fruit.  more...

December 6 ,  1877 :  Edison demonstrated the first sound recording.  more...

"Fish" is a word used to refer to any non-tetrapod vertebrate. The evolutionary history of fish began 530 million years ago, in the mid-Cambrian period. Some of the oldest known animals in the evolutionary history of fish are Pikaia gracilens, which resembles the modern-day lancelet, found in the famous Burgess shale assemblage, and Haikouichthys and Myllokunmingia from the Maotianshan shales of southern China. These simple jawless fish existed for approximately 100 million years until the first jawed fish evolved. These are also the earliest known vertebrates.

Initially, fish were minority members in an ecosystem dominated by invertebrates, especially brachiopods, sponges, and arthropods such as trilobites. It wouldn't be until the Silurian period, roughly 420 million years ago, that jawed fishes evolved and began to compete effectively with invertebrates. The earliest jawed fishes were placoderms, a family of fish with special head and thorax armor to protect them from predators. These fish are the ancestors of all modern vertebrates, including humans and all our pets and livestock.

The jawless fish were quickly outcompeted, leaving behind only a few small lineages which eventually gave rise to modern-day hagfish, lampreys, and lancelets. Sometimes these animals are not considered true fish because of their radically different physiology. There is even some disagreement as to whether lampreys are vertebrates at all, as their cartilage "skeleton" is so primitive.

Ad

The evolutionary history of fish continued with the dominance of the jawed fishes, especially placoderms, which grew as large as 6 m (20 ft) in superpredators such as Dunkelosteus telleri. Large predators like Dunkelosteus are considered the first vertebrate superpredators, and solidly established the role of vertebrates as apex predators in the world's ecosystems, a role which would continue for the rest of evolutionary history. Placoderms dominated throughout the Silurian period, for several dozen millions of years, until the Devonian, when fish began to rapidly diversify.

The Devonian was the greatest milestone period in the evolutionary history of fish, when many modern and extinct forms evolved from the placoderm seed, including sharks and rays, acanthodians ("spiny sharks," now extinct), ray-finned fishes (which dominate the seas today), and lobe-finned fishes, which eventually evolved into terrestrial vertebrates. Fishes successfully outcompeted many other marine organisms to become the dominant mobile marine animal, sharing the seas with small arthropods such as copepods and krill.

Though lobe-finned fishes and acanthodians demonstrated momentary success during the Devonian, acanthodians had pretty much died out by the end of the next period, the Carboniferous, while lobe-finned fishes became a tiny minority after giving rise to tetrapods during the same geologic period. For many years, they were thought to be represented only by the lungfish, until a coelacanth was pulled in off the coast of South Africa. The discovery of a living coelacanth was considered one of the biggest zoological finds of the 20th century.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

anon318358
Post 6

@FitzMaurice: The complex Greek and Latin based terms to classify different animals is used by all biologists and it is called binomial nomenclature. The system was created by Carl Linnaeus -- a Christian -- who organized and cataloged creatures based similar traits.

The fact that you did not know that and call Modern Evolutionary Theory "Darwinism," which has changed so much since Darwin's time it's hard to call it his. Also, the fact you have a weak grasp of scientific theory, tells me you have a poor foundation to stand on when arguing scientific principles and facts.

hangugeo112
Post 4

Jung uses the image of an "inner fish" as cropping up in dreams or in the psyche as symbolic of either being pregnant or having some aspect of your unconscious which is outside of your own control. Fish swim down deep and have a mind of their own, much like the "demons" of ones past.

FitzMaurice
Post 3

@Proxy414

You are very far in your estimation of me, I am not a person of faith of any kind, and would say I am agnostic. I am not a "creationist" per se, but am quite skeptical about the fierce establishment-fueled hegemony of Darwinism in academic circles. The truth is, as I have said, Darwinism comes very short of establishing any clear or strictly logic-based arguments for land animals having evolved from fish, or for any of its arguments. I think Darwinism is fast becoming a relic of the past as people learn to think for themselves. Cellular genetics speak for themselves.

Proxy414
Post 2

@FitzMaurice

Let me guess, you think that the earth was formed in six days and that god made all the animals at once, right? The very notion of creationism is absurd and is a relic of the past. It is an element which deserves nothing but derision in serious academic circles.

FitzMaurice
Post 1

Darwinism tends to use a lot of complex Greek and Latin based terms to classify different animals and to lend ostensible credibility to their "scientific laws," which are in truth very weak theories with a limited mathematical basis. The number of changes necessary for an aquatic animal to evolve into a quadruped land animal are immense, and we are very far from explaining the necessary links between a fish and a land animal of any kind.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email