What is the Difference Between a Virus and Bacteria?

health wellness

There are a number of differences between a virus and bacteria, or more appropriately, viruses and bacteria, including their relative sizes, reproduction methods and resistance to medical intervention. Bacterium, the singular form of the word bacteria, is a one-celled living organism, with complete sets of both ribonucleic acid (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) genetic codes. A virus is little more than a section of RNA or DNA covered by a protein shell. Bacterium, therefore, is at least a hundred times larger than a typical virus.

One major difference between viruses and bacteria is the method of reproduction. Bacterium is a completely self-contained and self-reproducing unit. When the time is right, bacterium will split its DNA and RNA genetic material in two. Separate cell walls will build up around these two new bacteria, and this process will continue until thousands or millions of bacteria have formed. This is how strains of bacteria survive in almost every environment on Earth, including non-living surfaces like rocks or plastic.

A virus, on the other hand, cannot reproduce without a living host. A virus may lie dormant for thousands of years before finally coming into contact with a suitable host. Once it enters the body of a host, a virus uses leg-like appendages to clamp onto a cell and a spike or chemical coating to penetrate the cell wall.

Once inside a living cell, a virus replaces the cell's original DNA or RNA commands with its own genetic instructions. Those instructions are usually to make as many copies of the virus as possible. Once the individual cell has outlived its usefulness, it explodes and sends out thousands of copies of the original virus to other unsuspecting cells.

Ninety-nine percent of all known bacteria are considered beneficial to humans, or at least harmless. They spend their days breaking down organic matter and destroying harmful parasites. The small percentage of bacteria considered harmful to the human body, such as streptococcus and E. coli, are still performing the same functions as their less-toxic bacteria brethren.

Bacteria feed on the tissues of the human body and excrete toxins and acids afterwards. It is these toxins and irritating acids that cause many of the problems associated with bacterial infection. If the bacteria can be killed with antibiotics, the infections left behind should clear up soon afterwards.

Most viruses, on the other hand, serve no beneficial purpose. Their sole mission in life is to create more viruses in order to assure survival of the strain. The deadly effect a virus has on its host is merely incidental.

When a virus enters the human body, it seeks out an acceptable host cell and seizes it without warning. Once the cell bursts, thousands of new viruses repeat the process on other healthy cells. By the time the body's natural defenses become aware of the invasion, the virus may have significant control over vital organs and tissues. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the Ebola virus are textbook examples of what dangerous viruses can do to a human body before they run their course.

Medical intervention and treatment is another major difference between viruses and bacteria. Bacteria is alive, which means it can be killed by some form of chemical agent. Antibiotics are chemical compounds that kill off bacteria by destroying their cell walls or neutralizing their ability to reproduce. The reason doctors prescribe lengthy rounds of antibiotics to patients is to create an environment in which bacteria cannot live. Although bacteria often eventually develop a tolerance for certain antibiotics, the effect is similar to using insecticide on insects.

Viruses, by comparison, are not considered living creatures. They cannot be 'killed' in the same sense as antibiotics kill bacteria or insecticide kills insects. In fact, treatment of viral infections is often no treatment at all. The disease must run its course until the body can mount a successful defense on its own. Anti-viral treatments, when they exist, work on the principle of blocking the virus' own destructive methods. Either the RNA or DNA strand of the virus must be rendered harmless genetically, or the methods of breaking through a cell wall must be destroyed.

Anti-viral medications are still largely experimental, which is why certain diseases such as AIDS, HIV and Ebola are still affecting millions of people world-wide. Scientists are still trying to understand the basic structure and genetic programming of viruses. Only by understanding how a virus works can a successful vaccine eventually be developed. Treating most bacteria-based diseases, on the other hand, can be a matter of finding the most effective antibiotic or using a broad spectrum approach.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category





  
  
  
	

		

New: Discuss this Article

Posted by: anon14329
I would like to echo what michaelp said and place an extra emphasis on consuming all prescribed antibiotics. Taking every pill in that bottle is very important because not only can the bacteria come back if all antibiotics are not consumed, but they can also come back *resistant* to antibiotics! If an individual infects another with this new resistant bacteria, a new strain is born that is now slightly more resilient. This presents quite an intellectual challenge for researchers as new bacteria is cropping up more resistant to our best medicine.
Posted by: michaelp
This is a non-professional opinion, but I believe the major reason why a physician insists a patient take the entire course of antibiotics is the reproductive nature of bacteria. One bacteria can become thousands or millions in a very short period of time, and antibiotics can only get ahead of the game if enough of them get into the fight against the invading bacteria.

If you stop taking the antibiotics before the end of the round, the remaining bacteria can reproduce and keep on infecting your body, thus keeping you sick. Only by allowing the antibiotics to overwhelm ALL of the living bacteria can you hope to get rid of the infection without it returning a few days later. As inconvenient as it may be, taking the entire round of antibiotics is the best way to go, even if you start feeling noticeably better during the middle of the round. Just because your infected ear pops or a swollen throat stops hurting doesn't mean you're cured.

Posted by: anon14181
Can somebody explain to me why it is important to complete the full round of antibiotics prescribed by the doctor?
Posted by: anon13342
It's not a second defense, as I know of it. But in some bacterial infections such as in syphilis, if a syphilitic patient gets a penicillin injection, the wall of the bacteria gets destroyed and the contents goes out to the body's environment resulting to a worsening of the patient's complaints. This reaction is called the Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction and is not considered as a drug allergy.
Posted by: anon12419
2nd defense? that's new to me too...
Posted by: anon8588
Bacteria are not classified as animals because they are unicellular prokaryotes; all animals are multicellular eukaryotes.
Posted by: somerset
I am not aware of this bacterial secondary mode of attack either. Bacterial wall is relatively tough, but also resilient and it gives bacteria it's shape. It also protects it from the environment. Some bacteria have rather strong walls, while others do not. Bacteria reproduce by fission, one cell breaks into two. The process takes anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours, depending on condition and type of bacteria
Posted by: anon5813
I never knew that there was a second defense for bacteria.
Posted by: anon4078
I was told that bacteria has a second defense. If you just break a bacteria, the protein shell can also cause health problems. This second mode of attack has a name which I can not remember. Has anyone else heard of this?

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Michael Pollick

copyright © 2003 - 2008
conjecture corporation