Feedback About wiseGEEK Login
Category: 
What Is the Defense of Marriage Act?
Article Details
  • Written By: Jessica Saras
  • Edited By: Michelle Arevalo
  • Last Modified Date: 29 April 2012
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2012
    Conjecture Corporation
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
More than 40% of the energy used in US homes in 2005 was for heating; 8% was for air conditioning.  more...

May 30 ,  1806 :  Andrew Jackson killed a man who insulted his wife.  more...

Signed into effect by former U.S. president Bill Clinton in 1996, the federal law known as the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defines marriage as the union of a man and a woman. In addition, it gives certain powers to the states, allowing each state’s government to determine its own laws regarding marriage.

Written by Georgia State Representative Bob Barr, the Defense of Marriage Act was originally intended to expand states’ rights, by overriding previous laws that required states to recognize marriages performed outside their borders. The reason for this arose in 1993, when Hawaii became the first state to recognize same-sex marriages. Lawmakers in many other states were concerned about how Hawaii’s ruling would affect their state’s laws, as many were vehemently opposed to same-sex marriages and did not feel the state should be required to recognize such unions. The the Defense of Marriage Act was developed in reaction.

After passing through the United States’ House of Representatives with a vote of 342-67, DOMA was brought before the Senate, and passed with a vote of 85 to 14. Several states enacted constitutional amendments to define marriage in the same terms as the federal government, granting marriages solely to heterosexual couples. In addition, under the Defense of Marriage Act, these same states were no longer required to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where such unions were allowed.

Although several states passed laws to recognize same-sex marriages, under the terms of the Defense of Marriage Act, only marriages between a man and a woman are recognized by the federal government. In other words, even if a state recognizes the marriage, the federal government does not — meaning partners in a same-sex marriage do not receive the same rights that heterosexual couples receive. For example, same-sex couples are not eligible for spousal Social Security or veterans’ benefits, and they do not qualify for the same tax credits that are available to heterosexual couples. Immigration privileges, inheritance protection, parental rights, and health insurance benefits are also affected by the act.

Many critics of DOMA have attempted to repeal the act, citing the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the 14th Amendment as grounds for its reversal. In 2009, numerous suits were filed against the federal government to challenge the constitutionality of the act. None of these attempts were successful, however, and the Defense of Marriage Act has remained in effect. As of June 2010, only five of the 50 U.S. states grant same-sex marriage licenses, and of the remaining states, only three recognize such unions.

Related Videos

Discuss this Article

Ivan83
Post 3

I am not in favor of the Defense of Mariage Act but I think that and all the talk of gay marriage over the last decade raise some important and tricky questions. Many of the opponents of same sex marriage make outrageous claims about people marrying horses or rocks. And while these are silly arguments they do point to the need to define marriage.

It is nice to think that we can have it be completely open and that anyone who loves anyone can get married. But the world is not that simple and marriage is about more than just love. Joining your life to another has a lot of practical consequences. Would we find it acceptable for a poly amorous couple to have some kind of three way marriage? That is just one example of the kinds of tricky situations that are certain to rise as we move further into the 21st century. I don't have all the answers but I can anticipate the questions.

nextcorrea
Post 2

I have never understood why the idea of protecting marriage involves restricting who has access to it. The same people who talk about the sanctity of marriage and it's primacy in our culture seem to completely misunderstand that this is only special if it is accessible to all of us.

If marriage is simply a privileged of some than it is no different than driving an expensive car or living in a huge house. Marriage becomes a dividing line when it has traditionally been a gesture of love.

whiteplane
Post 1

I think that the Defense of Marriage Act is one of the more unfortunate pieces of legislation to be voted into law over the last several decades. Luckily, I think that we live in a shifting cultural moment. I have heard that much of the opposition to same sex couples comes from older generations and is almost non existent in people under 40.

I want to believe that we live in a culture that is slowly becoming more enlightened and that in twenty or thirty years time same sex couples will have all the rights and privileges that the rest of us enjoy. And on the most fundamental level, don't we want to give people the freedom to love?

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?
or connect with facebook

Register

username
password
confirm
email