Public indecency is a legal term regarding acts or behaviors that may or may not be illegal, but are considered private behavior that could harm the public in some fashion. Typically, actions covered under public indecency laws are sexual in nature, ranging from public nudity to solicitation for prostitution. These laws tend to change as moral and ethical societal norms shift over time.
Not surprisingly, many behaviors that were once considered public indecency are no longer widely considered to be so; in the early 20th century, women could be arrested or fined for wearing bathing suits that exposed their arms or knees. Although standards have relaxed over time, the aim of public indecency laws remains the same; they are generally meant to prevent unwanted public exposure to behaviors that might be found offensive.
Some criminal offenses covered under public indecency laws include being nude or partially nude in public areas, engaging in sexual activities such as masturbation or intercourse in a public location, or exposing minors to sexually explicit images or behavior. Solicitation for prostitution may carry an indecency charge along with criminal charges for soliciting and engaging in prostitution where it is illegal. Interestingly, some regions also include activities such as adultery and homosexual behavior under public indecency laws, even if these behaviors are conducted in private.
Although in many areas the restrictions on decency laws have waned, there are still some controversies about the right to determine and enforce these laws, as well as the classifications of certain behaviors as criminal. In California, for example, women can be charged with public indecency and required to register as a sex offender for sunbathing topless, whereas for men, toplessness is not considered a crime. Laws such as this form a basis for a legal and ethical argument that public indecency statutes can be used to impose sexism and selective attitudes toward morality and equality.
The scope of public indecency laws depends largely on the structure of the laws governing behavior in the region. In some areas, prostitution and nude bathing are legal, where as in neighboring regions, they are criminal offenses. More liberal areas may have few public restrictions on clothing as long as genitalia are covered, but some regions have decency laws insisting on certain dress codes and can fiercely penalize offenders with jail time, fines, whipping, and other serious punishments.
|
anon239894
Post 5 |
I don't understand why it's OK for a woman to show her breasts or body parts to people, but why a man is so much more shamed for doing the same. It seems really sexist and generally unfair. |
|
anon233564
Post 4 |
Why is the human body considered wrong? It is beautiful and natural. Children spend their baby years running around naked and sucking on breasts. Then as soon as they no longer need to breast feed, the breast becomes this dirty thing that they can no longer look at. It makes no sense. Also what makes a man's nipple any different than a woman's nipple? Nothing other than the gender of the person it is on. Forcing women to cover up because their breasts are seen as dirty, indecent and wrong is degrading to women. |
|
Bhutan
Post 3 |
GreenWeaver-I totally agree with you. There was also another case in Oregon where the woman thought it was her right to walk around nude in the street.
This woman was not even thinking about children that might see her in the street and how the parents would have to explain this outburst.
It is really shame that some people choose to make a political point while offending everyone else and not thinking about the consequences of their actions.
This is not free speech. It is downright offensive. |
|
GreenWeaver
Post 2 |
SauteePan-I heard about that case and I would never buy any of her records as a result of this stunt. It was appalling.
There was a case where a woman was topless on a bus and she was charged with public indecency on the bus.
Many times these people are mentally ill and need psychiatric help. However, they do pose a danger to children who should not have their innocence robbed in that way by seeing something that they are not ready to see like that.
|
|
SauteePan
Post 1 |
I just wanted to say that there is a big difference between a man walking around without a shirt and a topless woman.
The topless women would be charged with indecency because that form of exposure is unacceptable in our society.
For example, the singer Erika Badu was charged with public indecency in Dallas recently as she was trying to make some sort of artistic statement by the John F. Kennedy library.
What was appalling was that she walked around nude during the daylight hours where children may have been exposed to this display.
To me this is not art, but a publicity stunt in order to sell records, but she showed very poor form.
|