What is Personification?

language humanities

Personification is the act in speech and writing of giving inanimate objects, abstract concepts or actions, human or near human characteristics. It is different than anthropomorphism, which gives animals both human personality and behavior. Personification is a type of metaphor since it is a metaphoric way of spicing up writing, and making the abstract more relatable.

Though personification is a frequent literary device in poetry, it is also in daily common speech. For example, a person might look at a clock and say, “Time just got away from me.” This suggests that the concept of “time” has self-will, and the person was attempting wrestle with time to stay put. Time however “got away.”

Even young children use personification regularly. A child might be asked if he threw a pencil. The child might reply, “I didn’t throw it. It threw itself.” While the child here uses personification as an evasion tactic, he is still giving the pencil somewhat human characteristics that it does not possess.

In literature, it is easy to find examples of personification. Fog “creeps.” Thoughts “explode.” Trees “menace.” Clouds “portend.” Death becomes a “messenger.” These examples are all ways in which a writer can use personification to make ordinary objects or abstract concepts essentially come alive and provide more of an emotional feel for the reader. The examples above also give the things personified human characteristics, which connect to the reader’s understanding of the human world, and human actions.

In the magazine In Context, Joseph Campbell gave an interview in 1985 where he suggested that personification was one way in which those following a religion came to terms with the huge and abstract concept of God. Of course the Bible begins quite soon, telling us that Man is made in “God’s image.” In the Judeo-Christian tradition this immediately personifies God. God is male and looks like a man.

Such personification allows for people to more readily keep to the concept of a personal God, since he is like a father, who looks very much like the rest of us. Earlier religious concepts also suggest personification of a number of things present in the environment or in the stars.

Animism sees aspects of the divine in simple natural elements, like the sun, the moon, the trees, or the river. By ascribing human intent or characteristics to these objects, better understanding of what constitutes a deity or multiple deities is reached.

If the sun laughs when it is high in the sky, or the moon sleeps, these astral bodies are suddenly human and therefore a person can relate to them. Conversely, when the sun is described in purely scientific terms it becomes remote and impersonal. It may be understood scientifically, but is much harder to “get” emotionally.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

New: Discuss this Article

Posted by: dfrum32
I disagree with this part:

"In the Judeo-Christian tradition this immediately personifies God. God is male and looks like a man."

Man being made in God's image refers to both Adam and Eve, meaning that both male and female are part of god's image - that neither men nor women completely sum up the image of God. There are parts of the Old Testament that refer to God as a mother who does not forget the baby at her breast, etc. I think it is completely wrong to say that in Judaism or Christianity, God is depicted as male.

Jesus is male, because Christians believe that he actually became a man, which is different than personification. However, the only reason we call God "He" is because in English it sounds disrespectful to say "it" - there is not a gender ascribed to god in either religion.

Posted by: dfrum32
"God" in that last line should be capitalized!
Posted by: WGwriter
Interesting point. I think however, the move toward considering God as female in both Judaism or Christianity, or considering God as asexual is recent. The Catholic Church for instance did an excellent job of assigning gender to God for many centuries, despite earlier texts and perhaps suppressed texts suggesting a less gender-specific God.

Nevertheless, Man is considered as created in God's image, but the man referred to in Genesis is Adam, from whom woman is created. And woman looks very different than man, one must admit. Moreover, we refer to God the father, almost never the mother, in most Christian churches in the West, as did Jesus, according to the majority of the New Testament.

I'd be very interested if you belong to a sect of Christianity where that is not the case and would name it; since that would seem to differ from a traditional gender assigned God.


FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Tricia Ellis-Christensen

copyright © 2003 - 2008
conjecture corporation