Category: 

What Is Offer and Acceptance?

A contract cannot be formed without mutual assent, or offer and acceptance.
Article Details
  • Written By: M. Lupica
  • Edited By: John Allen
  • Last Modified Date: 13 October 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Coloring your hair in the ‘30s often came with swollen eyelids, blisters and headaches.  more...

October 21 ,  1879 :  Thomas Edison lit up a light bulb for the first time.  more...

Offer and acceptance — collectively called mutual assent — is the most basic building block by which every contract is formed. Without a valid offer and acceptance, no contract will be made. There are many different legal constructs that lead to mutual assent of two parties and the formation of an agreement, but the guiding principle is always a communication of ideas that lead to a “meeting of the minds.” Though an offer and acceptance are necessities in the formation of a contract, they are not the only requirement. Additionally, the both parties must receive some sort of benefit from the formation of the contract, called consideration.

An offer is said to be made when there are words or actions by the offeror that create a reasonable expectation in the offeree that the offeror is willing to enter into a binding agreement based on the articulated terms. In order for an offer to be valid, there must have been a communication, through words or actions, that express a promise or intent to commit to terms that have been concretely defined. Though some situations dictate that an offer and acceptance be in writing, such as in sales of land, an offer may be communicated verbally and still held to be as valid as a written offer.

Ad

As long as the offer remains open, the party to whom the offer was communicated may accept the offer and effect a valid contract. Generally, an acceptance must be unequivocal in order for it to be deemed a valid offer and acceptance. For example, if an offeror communicates to the offeree to make repairs on a house for a stated amount of money, a valid offer has been made. If the offeror responds by saying “I accept as long as the job is completed within one week,” it is not an unequivocal acceptance. Rather, in this case, the response is deemed a rejection of the original offer and the presentation of a counter offer that includes the term that the job is completed within a week.

Aside from offer and acceptance, the final basic building block to contract formation is consideration. Consideration refers to the conferring of a benefit to both parties, and the absence of consideration in an offer to either party is merely a promise and no contract may be formed. Continuing the previous example where the offeror suggested that he or she complete repairs on the offeree’s house in exchange for a stated amount of money, the repair work and the money are the two parties’ respective considerations. Were the offeror to state in his or her offer that he or she would complete the repairs on the offeree’s house for free, then even if the offeree were to explicitly agree, the absence of consideration to the offeror prevents the formation of a valid contract despite the existence of a clear offer and acceptance.

Ad

More from Wisegeek

You might also Like

Discuss this Article

Markerrag
Post 2

@Melonlity -- that's basically true, but think about this. It is common practice when someone is selling cars to tell a few people they can have it for a certain amount of money. The offer isn't seen as accepted until the buyer shows up with cash in hand.

If things didn't work that way, putting a car for sale in the classifieds section of the local newspaper would be a scary thing.

Melonlity
Post 1

There are a lot of times that a verbal offer will be viewed as valid as a written one, but it is always a good idea to have it down in writing.

Here is why. Let's say that Bob offers to sell his car to Joe for $5,000. Joe thinks about and, two days later, brings his money to Bob. Bob has already sold the car. If Joe complains and says he had a valid offer and could accept it, he won't have a leg to stand on if Bob simply says he never made the offer or claims it expired and Joe knew it.

In that situation, Joe should have insisted on something in writing and asked for a termination date to be included. If both parties sign that document, there is no question as to whether the offer was made and how long Joe had to accept it.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email