Manifest Destiny was a concept which heavily influenced American policy in the 1800s. The idea was the driving force behind the rapid expansion of America into the West from the East, and it was heavily promoted in newspapers, posters, and through other mediums. While Manifest Destiny was not itself an official government policy, it led to the passage of legislation such as the Homestead Act, which encouraged Westward colonization and territorial acquisition. It also played an important role in American thought.
The term was first used in 1845 by John O'Sullivan, an American newspaper editor who was writing about the proposed annexation of Texas. O'Sullivan stated that it was America's “manifest destiny to overspread the continent.” The editorial suggested that through expansion, the United States could become a recognized political and social superpower. America had, in fact, O'Sullivan argued, been uniquely chosen for the task of expanding Westward, driving out the wilderness and establishing civilization.
The Westward expansion of the United States did not, of course, begin with Manifest Destiny. The Louisiana Purchase of 1803, in which 23% of the existing territory of the United States was acquired, was probably the first major step. The government saw the appeal in acquiring more land, as well as the potential political power which large tracts of land could confer upon the young nation. As a result, a policy pursuing aggressive expansion was actively pursued. The idea of Manifest Destiny was merely a component, and one which captured the popular imagination.
O'Sullivan's Manifest Destiny editorial added fuel to the fire with a catchy phrase. Numerous government campaigns painted the allures of the West for prospective settlers, and promoted programs which could help people acquire and hold land in the West. With the discovery of gold and other valuable minerals, a tide of Easterners started to pour into the West, supported by their belief in their right and duty to expand.
The idea of Manifest Destiny was also behind American political actions overseas. Although the term ceased to be used in a political context in the early twentieth century, the far-reaching impact of Manifest Destiny was clear. A section of the Manifest Destiny editorial reminded Americans that they were uniquely positioned to spread democracy throughout the world, and this concept clearly played a role in twentieth century American foreign policy. Many historians use the term “Manifest Destiny” to refer to the period in American history which was marked by rapid expansion “from sea to shining sea” through annexation of the Western half of the continent.
"Who cares about greed and all that?" What on earth are you talking about? Greed is what lit the fire that became westward expansionism. Greed spawned what became many, if not all, of the states west of the Mississippi. Clearly, anon51432, you never paid attention in history class from like the fourth grade onward. what a stupid comment you wrote.
Greed is in the hearts of all humans. It's just a part of who we are, and therefore it cannot be ignored!
If I were you, anon51432, next time you want to make a comment, make sure you know what you're talking about.
- anon52585
37
everyone has their individual views on what America did to be born. But what anon 51432 said, forget about the past, shouldn't be considered. without the past you would not know how to react to the future conflicts we have now.
- anon52328
36
anon you talk a lot of smack. it's all the past. who cares about greed and all that? and the term is white people not gringos. O.K.? and if they didn't do that the united states wouldn't be what it is today.
- anon51432
35
Looking at the history of the United States of America our founding fathers used manifest destiny as an excuse for the way they treated other races and an explanation for greed and power.
Some say if they had not done what they did we would not be where we are today. Is what we have today worth a history of pain, blood, injustice and evil doing? Maybe it is to those who did not have to live it every single day. I challenge you to put yourselves in the shoes of those who cultures were trampled and identities stolen. Would you feel that it was worth it?
- anon50897
34
When looking back at these times - Manifest Destiny - one can clearly see yet another method of land cession by the U.S. It is hard to believe that with so many hands in this, no one saw or had the ability to understand that so much of what they were doing was wrong. From over-harvest of resources and animals, to destruction of life-sustaining elements of native people, the spread of disease, the stamping out of native heritage all makes me feel shame even now. I often wonder what life would be like today if we had been honest, cooperative and kind to those who deserved such respect.
- anon50712
32
Everyone, read native america, discovered and conquered thomas jefferson, lewis and clark, and manifest destiny. it is written by robert j. Miller. It will help in understanding manifest destiny. Plus it predates the americas. So check it out.
- anon48234
30
If the mexicans stood up and kicked out the Spanish? Like the 13 colonies kicked the British out and had a stable government! Maybe they could have still owned California, Texas etc. Just remember it's over! If you were a citizen back then of the united states of 13 you would have the same feelings. But if you're in the united states now it's ok being a bad citizen? Complain about everything even stuff out of your control: slavery, Indians and mexicans? It's over and done. 1800s history!
- anon46129
29
Great discussions!
- anon45483
28
Manifest Destiny is the gringo's excuse to dominate land. Suppose that god's will was for them to expand. An excuse for imperialism and the taking of riches of the land(gold). We see this phenomenon not only on American land(as we know it as now) we see it in the days of the crusades, the missions/exploitations in Africa.
- anon45117
25
help what is the purpose/definition of manifest destiny?
- anon42959
23
This smells of duality. On one hand you have the Europeans destroying lives to acquire land which present a so called moral dilemma. On the other hand, you have the nature of human groups or tribes. As far as we can go back in time, humans as groups, tribes or nations have sought to conquer each other. If you see this as a natural act then you cannot argue against Manifest Destiny. Being that my mother was Native American I feel the pain of my forefathers who lost their land because of Manifest Destiny. Yet, at the same time I do understand that they did not claim the land to be theirs. They just lived on it, they used the land treating it with respect. The Europeans used many ways to take the land. What bothers me about Manifest Destiny is the same problem I have with the slave trade. After perpetrating the act(s) of slavery and genocide they feel that it is wrong for the victims to seek compensation, justice, and true equality. If the descendants of these victims were to exact revenge and/or seek compensation is that wrong? No, it is not! Yet, they have placed in the minds of the descendants of the victims a false sense of right and wrong. It is an illusion! There is no true freedom when the oppressor makes up and controls the laws. The true meaning of freedom is to be able to do what one wants to as long as it is within one rights granted by the law. If the laws are controlled by a certain elite and the minds of the masses are as well controlled by the above mentioned elite then where is there any freedom. You call it ego while I call it inequality!
- MalikShabazz
22
wow this is better than my text book and it was written by one of the best textbook companie in the world.
- anon38477
21
The problem with Manifest Destiny is that it simply did not expand far enough north or south until the entire western hemisphere would have become one great United States of America!
- anon38118
20
Manifest destiny was not opposed by the Americans. Actually, they wanted it. They would force Natives off their land to move west.
- anon32459
18
The manifest helped with the shaping of the U.S. because without it we wouldn't have that much land and that's what they really want; more land for the free is what most people protested in that time; Manifest Destiny was just the governments way of saying more land for the free.
- anon31102
16
Does anyone know if some Americans oppose or anyone else opposes manifest destiny?
- ghosts
14
What was the most important land acquisition during Manifest Destiny?
- bobcat3
13
Manifest destiny affected the united states whether the natives were condemned or not.
- anon28479
11
Manifest Destiny=Genocide, Stealing, Killing, Greed, anti-christian, anti-ten commandments, anti-human, hypocrisy, etc. etc. etc...
- anon27144
10
was there someone who actually *wrote* it? or is it even a document?
- anon26505
8
Posted by: anon12591
how did manifest destiny shape the growth of the U.S? The United States Govt. held both it's left hand and right hand entwined during the "Exploration" of this country. The left hand was called Manifest Destiny, and the right hand is called genocide. The two hands strangled native Americans as they pushed them from the East to the West coast.
For an amazing read, check out "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee."
Then if you can stand it... go read the current world news. It will make you wonder where Manifest Destiny ends.
- quadradomus
4
In response to anon17209, you could definitely argue that Manifest Destiny is ego driven. The thing is, so are a lot of other things. When you look at US History, Americans do a lot of things that, when viewed in hindsight, look hypocritical or manipulative or just plain wrong. But you have to remember that they were living in a different time and some things were necessary evils.
And, when it comes down to it, whether or not it was ego driven doesn't really matter. It got the job done.
- anon19960
3
Isn't manifest destiny really another way to say that certain ideas are worth pushing onto others without their say being considered?
It seems as though the concept is very ego driven. Ego of a new government, politicians, etc. I realize that if the US hadn't pursued the concept of manifest destiny that the world would be a very different place; my point is that the pursuit of US expansion seems like a lot of ego vs. philanthropy (which no one ever claimed, anyway - just trying to make a distinction).
- anon17209
2
how did manifest destiny shape the growth of the U.S?
- anon12591
1
Wisegeek is the best! It gives you what you want and need straight forward. It is the best site for information i have ever used.