Category: 

What Is Green Energy?

A house using solar panels, a source of green energy.
Wind power is one form of green energy.
The Hoover Dam is used to generate hydroelectric power, a form of green energy.
Article Details
  • Originally Written By: Phil Shepley
  • Revised By: Emma Lloyd
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 14 October 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Waking up in the middle of the night is normal for humans.  more...

October 31 ,  1984 :  Indira Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, was assassinated.  more...

Green energy is energy that is produced in such a way as to minimize its negative impact on the environment. Traditional energy sources, most notably fossil fuels, produce greenhouse gases that are believed to be the primary cause of an effect known as global warming or climate change. Sources of green energy, such as solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro energy, are developed and promoted as alternative sources that make little or no contribution to climate change. Even nuclear energy is sometimes considered a green energy source, because some types of nuclear technology produce much less waste than oil and coal.

Why Green Energy is Important

The industrial revolution that began in the second half of the 18th century changed the world, with new methods of machine-based manufacturing leading to a profound increase in economic growth, population growth, and quality of life. At the time, the long-term consequences could not even be conceived of, much less felt; however, the burning of vast quantities of fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, has caused a great deal of harm to the environment. Most climatologists agree that the use of fossil fuels has contributed significantly to global warming. This term refers to the measured increase in the Earth’s surface temperature since the late 19th century and the environmental effects of this change.

Ad

The primary goal of developing green sources of energy is to generate power while minimizing both waste and pollution, to thereby reduce the impact of energy production on the environment. Scientists who advocate the use of green energy say that using such sources will reduce the rate at which climate change occurs, although it cannot stop or reverse the temperature increase. Another important objective is creating energy sources that are renewable. This is in contrast to fossil fuel sources, which are finite and estimated to be depleted before the end of the 22nd century.

Hydro Energy

This technology uses the movement of water to power turbines attached to generators, and in many countries, it provides a larger proportion of energy than any other green resource. Hydropower does not produce a significant amount of waste and provides a unique environmental advantage. Many of the largest hydroelectric damns make use of a reservoir, which can serve as a location for recreational activities. The presence of a large water supply can also provide valuable support for agricultural regions.

In some cases, however, damming a river and creating an artificial lake can cause damage to the environment. Fish may not be able to make their way past the dam, for example, reducing their populations. Man-made reservoirs require flooding an area that was previously dry, changing it dramatically. The Three Gorges Dam in China offers a clear example of both: the baiji or Yangtze river dolphin, which lived in the river where the dam was built, is now functionally extinct, and over 1 million people were forced to relocate when their towns were covered in water to create the reservoir.

Solar Power

Solar power does not produce any emissions, is renewable, and is highly suitable for powering portable devices as well as homes. Many new homes take solar energy generation into consideration as a design concept, with solar panels and water-heating systems. While the goal of solar-powered transport has not yet been achieved, the panels can be employed in vehicles as a source of power for air conditioning.

When it comes to large-scale energy production, the main disadvantage of solar technology is that solar panels and energy storage devices use a significant amount of land. This can be defrayed somewhat by building on land that is not suitable for other uses. Although the technology has improved, most are only about 20% efficient and can be expensive to install.

Wind Power

Wind is used to generate energy with large turbines connected to a power collection, storage, and distribution system. This type of energy generation is a highly effective method of providing electricity to small, isolated communities. They are often preferred over solar-powered methods in agricultural areas, because land which contains wind turbines is more easily able to be used for other purposes. Off-shore wind farms have much higher building and maintenance costs, but they are able to harness stronger, more consistent winds.

Because the turbines are large, some people complain that they are eyesores that distract from the beauty of the environment. There is also some concern that they could harm local bird and bat populations.

Geothermal Energy

Geothermal energy is generated by the earth underneath its surface in the form of heat. While it is not technically a renewable source, it is sustainable more or less indefinitely, and produces only a small amount of waste in comparison to fossil fuels. Many countries use this type of energy for a portion of their requirements, but most thermal energy plants are located near tectonic plate boundaries, where the energy can be extracted more easily. The potential of geothermal energy to supply a significant portion of the world is limited by the expense of the technology it requires.

Nuclear Energy

Some types of nuclear energy are categorized as green because they produce very small amounts of waste. A green nuclear reactor can burn its own nuclear waste to produce energy, relying on a process called nuclear transmutation. In this process, the waste is converted into progressively lower-energy forms via further similar reactions. This means that almost all of the available energy can be extracted from thorium or uranium, the fuel sources most often used in nuclear energy plants. Scientists believe that this form of energy production is so efficient, it could provide for 100% of the earth’s needs for up to five billion years.

Many people fear nuclear power, however, because of accidents like those at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine and the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant in Japan. A disaster of this magnitude can not only kill workers and others near the power plant, it could potentially lead to an increase in cancer in the population exposed to radioactivity released during the incident. A very small number of incidents of this magnitude have occurred, however, and even the Fukushima Daiichi disaster, which was one of the biggest in history, is not expected to increase cancer-related deaths in the area significantly.

Cleaner Fossil Fuels

Aside from developing new energy sources, another goal of the green energy movement is to refine existing fossil fuel technology to make it more environmentally-friendly. An example of this is so-called clean coal technology, which attempts to reduce gas emissions from burning coal. One means by which this can be accomplished is to convert coal into a gas, and then generate energy by burning the gas. While this type of energy production is cleaner than traditional methods of burning fossil fuels, critics believe that the environmental cost is still too high. Another issue is that even though the technology is less harmful, coal is still a finite resource.

Ad

More from Wisegeek

You might also Like

Discuss this Article

anon326135
Post 19

In this case, I don't think we should call it green energy but less impacting energy as it also impacts on the environment. Meaning there is no such thing as green energy.

anon191547
Post 15

Green energy sources like Solar Queensland are being discovered by the tree hugger crowd and many of them are looking toward building it into energy efficient and environmentally safe homes.

anon177693
Post 14

The article should also focus on those industries that are producing solar panels. They are seriously damaging the environment. If they could produce equipment for utilizing solar energy without or with minimum impact to the environment, then the solar energy would really become a clean and green energy.

anon153706
Post 13

I think it's lovely that you are expanding the knowledge of green energy. We surely need to stop the use of coal and nuclear in our power plants.

Ambit Energy
Post 12

It is a fact of life. People will continue to use more and more electricity. Alternate means of electricity production is the key. Wind and solar are our two main "free" sources and we are learning to harness these better every day. All it takes is for everyone to help out just a little bit.

anon130242
Post 11

It's a good site to know about green energy.

anon114793
Post 9

Green energy technology is a future technology to save our future. besides clean coal technology other options include third and fourth generation biofuels that can also be opted on a commercial scale.

anon111077
Post 7

green energy Technologies like solar, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric and wind energy is 98-99 percent cleaner than any natural gas or coal power plant etc.

anon107195
Post 6

this site is to good. we get a lot of information from this site.

anon105355
Post 5

I liked this site. this site gives a lot of information. This is the best site I have ever seen. thank you!

anon102555
Post 4

Excellent post! Many thanks for the article.

Georgesplane
Post 3

@ breakofday - Glasshouse failed to answer your question about clean coal technology. As of now, clean coal technology is a pipe dream. It exists in theory, but has never been tested in a commercial application. Clean coal technology relies on the containment and sequestering of all emissions associated with the burning of coal. The technology is less developed than the available green technologies like solar, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectric. Clean coal is also significantly more expensive since it requires three systems: one to burn the coal and produce electricity; one to capture the emissions, and sort the various byproducts of the coal; and one two permanently bury the carbon below the earth's surface. Because they are still in the research phase they will surely cost taxpayers more money than improving the efficiency of existing technologies. The rate payers will also pay more for electricity produced form clean coal because it requires a large initial investment and a continuous stream of revenue to mine and supply the coal for fuel. Green renewable energy systems on the other hand only require the initial investment to build the plant, and a small revenue stream to maintain the site, simply because the fuel source is free. In theory economic forces of supply and demand will cause fossil fuel sources of energy to become more expensive as resources become scarce, while renewable systems will become cheaper as an ROI on the initial investment is made. Currently fossil energy prices are artificially cheap due to the subsidies and tax credits given to oil, coal and natural gas companies. These subsidies do not expire (they can only be repealed), and are paid for by every taxpayer; even if you live off the grid and ride a bicycle everywhere you go. These subsidies are the reason that gas is $7-$11 a gallon in Europe as well as why Europe is far ahead of the United States in renewable energy and fuel efficiency (ever wonder why the most efficient cars are from European brands, or why all wind turbines except those made by GE come from European companies).

Glasshouse
Post 2

@Breakofday - You bring up a good point about green energy not being completely green. Every resource we use, regardless of how efficient we use it or how good the technology, will have some sort of environmental impact. This does not mean that 'green energy' (or sustainable energy systems as I prefer) are not important. The earth's systems, both living and inert, can recover from moderate amounts of degradation; regardless of whether the causes are natural or anthropogenic. The point of renewable 'green' energy technologies is that they allow the planet time to recover from any damage done. This allows humanity the chance to accomplish its ideological goals; which are adaptation and advancement of civilization. Humanity cannot advance if it cannot even make it out of the twenty first century. When you look at the secondary and tertiary externalities associated with 'green' energy technologies, it may be evident that true zero emissions ranks up there with the perpetual motion machine in plausibility, but the efficiencies of such systems should not be denied. An example would be a wind farm. From the mining of the materials that go into the building of turbines to the decommissioning of the site and disposal of materials, wind energy is 98-99% cleaner than any natural gas or coal power plant. That is a fact that has been extensively studied by various NGO and government organizations.

breakofday
Post 1

Ah, so it's not really green as in "produces no harmful pollution", but just greenER.

Honestly now, is there REALLY such a thing as Clean Coal technology? One set of commercials say yes, the other say no.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email