Category: 

What is False Imprisonment?

Article Details
  • Written By: Charity Delich
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 11 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The Argentinian resort town of EpecuĂ©n was submerged by flooding for years; it is now populated by one elderly man.  more...

December 5 ,  1933 :  Prohibition ended in the US.  more...

False imprisonment occurs when a person is detained either without legal authorization or against his or her will. False imprisonment can also take place when someone prevents another person from leaving a vehicle, room, building, or other area. For example, suppose that a man pulls out a gun and threatens to shoot his wife if she leaves their apartment. The man could be found guilty of wrongfully holding his wife against her will.

False imprisonment claims can be raised in civil lawsuits or criminal cases. In a civil suit, a claim may be brought as a tort claim to recover monetary damages. In criminal cases, it is frequently a misdemeanor or felony that can result in jail time or fines.

In most civil false imprisonment suits, the plaintiff has the burden of proving that he or she was unreasonably detained. After the plaintiff establishes each element of the claim, the defendant is required to show that the detention was legally justified. Similarly, in a criminal case, the prosecution must prove each element of false imprisonment, often beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant may then respond or poke holes in the prosecution’s case.

Ad

During most detention cases, the detainee is held against his or her will due to coercion, force, or threat. Typically, false imprisonment does not occur if a person consents to being held. For instance, suppose that a police officer asks a man to come down to the police station and answer a few questions. Suppose also that the man is held in a room while the offer questions him. If the man has simply agreed to be held in the room of his own accord, the police officer would not be wrongfully detaining the man.

In some situations, the right to detain a person exists in a limited capacity. For instance, consider a situation in which a store manager suspects a shopper of shoplifting. In most jurisdictions, the manager would have the right to hold the shopper for a reasonable period of time in order to investigate whether shoplifting has occurred. If, however, the manager detains the shopper for an unreasonable period of time, the manager could be charged with false imprisonment.

As a general rule, false imprisonment does not apply to parents or other authority figures who prevent minor children from leaving a room or vehicle. For example, a school teacher would have the right to prevent a child from leaving a classroom during school hours. Once a child becomes an adult, however, a parent no longer has the right to detain the child. Spouses usually do not have the right to detain one another.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

Reminiscence
Post 2

I've heard of a lot of domestic violence cases that include a charge of false imprisonment. I suppose if the aggressor locks the door during the assault, the victim can claim there was no way out of the situation. The defendant might argue about other details of the incident, like self-defense or mutual combat, but it's hard to disprove false imprisonment. If someone had an opportunity to leave and didn't take it, it's a safe bet that person was being falsely imprisoned.

Inaventu
Post 1

I was in a situation one time where something really expensive came up missing at work and the supervisor herded us all into a conference room while someone searched the entire premises. We were told if any of us left that room before the search was over, we would all be fired for insubordination. He looked like the kind who would do it, too. We stayed in that room for nearly 5 hours, and the supervisor told us to go home and basically keep our mouths shut about the detention.

I've often wondered if any of us could have filed a false imprisonment lawsuit, since he did use the threat of termination to keep up inside that room. Because

of the kind of door it was, he couldn't actually lock us inside. He put something heavy on the other side. It turned out that none of us were guilty of stealing that machine, so the premise for the detention was also false. He was fired several months later, so it's now a moot point.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email