Category: 

What is Electronic Voting?

Electronic voting is the use of an electronic interface to collect and tabulate votes.
Article Details
  • Written By: Mary McMahon
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Last Modified Date: 30 March 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
A 2003 blackout affected 50 million people in North America and had an economic impact of about $10 billion USD.  more...

April 23 ,  :  William Shakespeare was born and died. (1564, 1616)  more...

When voters use electronic systems to cast their votes, this is known as electronic voting or e-voting. A number of electronic voting systems are used worldwide, from optical scanners which read manually marked ballots to entirely electronic touchscreen voting systems. Supporters of electronic voting systems believe that these systems are more accurate and efficient than traditional paper ballots, while critics are concerned about the security of e-voting. Some critics actually support electronic voting on principle, but they want to see the development of better systems which protect the rights of voters.

For citizens, voting is a relatively straightforward process. A citizen marks a ballot to indicate his or her preferences and then turns the ballot in to a voting official. Voting officials must carefully control their ballots to ensure that they are not spoiled or damaged, and then they must quickly and accurately tally the votes collected. Electronic voting systems are designed to make things easier for election officials by collecting and processing votes so that election results can be obtained instantaneously.

Many communities in the United States are converting to electronic voting to comply with legal mandates. Electronic voting is supposed to be easier for voters with disabilities, and entirely electronic systems like touchscreens can be programmed to display information in different languages, or to deliver voting choices in audio for visually impaired voters. Many of these mandates are also designed to streamline the voting process in the hopes of preventing disenfranchisement.

Ad

Using electronic voting machines is usually easy for voters. In the case of an optical scanning system, a voter is given a paper ballot to fill out, along with a special marking pen. After filling out the ballot, the voter feeds it into an optical scanning machine which reads and tallies the marks. A touchscreen voting system presents voting choices on a screen which the voter can touch to register preferences.

There are some serious flaws involved in electronic voting. Many of these machines do not have a paper trail, for example. This makes it difficult for voters to verify that their votes were registered correctly, making voting precincts vulnerable to fraud. Electronic voting also has variable error rates, and it can be difficult to obtain information about voting machines from their manufacturers, since these companies want to retain proprietary secrets to protect their share of the market. Critics of these systems hope that these flaws can be addressed to make electronic voting safe, secure, and reliable.

Ad

Discuss this Article

matthewc23
Post 4

I think the idea of the scanning ballot machine is probably the best overall. First off, the machine is really simple and cost effective to manufacture and buy. I think the second benefit is that you can get the results tallied quickly and easily by the computer. On top of all that, though, you also have the physical ballot sheets in chase there is a cause for needing to count the votes manually.

In all honesty, a manual count of the votes in a national or even state election is usually unnecessary, but I come from a pretty small town where some of the elections are decided by a matter of a few votes. In those cases, it would be important to have the cards to recount them and ensure that the computers were right. I would hate to be in an election and lose by a few votes and have to think that I possibly lost because of a problem with an electronic voting machine.

jcraig
Post 3

Sure, there might be some potential electronic voting problems, but you still have to consider the alternative. Does anyone really want another one of the fiascoes that happened during the 2000 election? Electronic voting issues exist, but I would still trust a computer to keep track of the votes more efficiently than a human keeping tally on a sheet of paper.

The place where I vote uses the scanning machines. I am curious if there is any electronic voting software that uses a touch screen or if that technology is in the works? I'm sure if they don't already exist, it is just a matter of time until we start seeing them.

kentuckycat
Post 2

@TreeMan - Yeah, I don't think the vast majority of polling places in the US would be subject to corruption, but that is definitely not the case in a lot of other countries.

I know in a lot of the recent elections in the Middle East there have been accusations of the votes being rigged. In those cases, it would probably be more effective to have the electronic voting equipment, since then people couldn't just put several ballots in the box. Obviously, there are still ways around it, though, so the problem really needs to be stopped at the source if you want to fix those issues.

The thing I was wondering, too, was what happened if you were in one of the electronic voting booths and the thing froze on you. It is still basically a computer, after all.

TreeMan
Post 1

My voting precinct has an electronic ballot machine, and I have always wondered a lot of the same things this article mentions.

I don't think anyone in my area is going to cheat the system and try to rig the machines, but it seems like there would always be the possibility of a voting machine malfunctioning and losing the votes. Do they have some sort of mechanism in place that backs up the votes that were taken in case the main hard drive or whatever it is becomes corrupted?

Also, what does the article mean when it says the voting machines have variable error rates? Surely that doesn't mean that if you vote for one person it will tally a vote for another, does it?

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email