Category: 

What is Differance?

Article Details
  • Written By: Jessica Ellis
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Image By: Arturo Espinosa
  • Last Modified Date: 14 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The great magician and escape artist Harry Houdini died on Halloween in 1926.  more...

December 11 ,  1946 :  UNICEF was established.  more...

Differance is a French word coined by the French philosopher and deconstructionist, Jacques Derrida. The word is a play on several other words that illustrate Derrida’s meaning. The concept of differance is a complex theory that tries to illuminate the way words are used and how their specific meaning is derived. Derrida called differance a "neographism," meaning a term that is neither a word nor a concept and is used to describe a literary idea.

To create and illustrate the term, Derrida deliberately misspelled the French word difference although the two words are pronounced identically. Although some later critics returned to the original spelling, Derrida did this intentionally, to highlight the idea that hearing a word does not give the complete picture or meaning of it and that appearances can be deceiving. In his theory of deconstruction, Derrida claimed that because each person has different moods, backgrounds, and ways of experiencing things, a word or choice of words will not conjure up the same idea to every person.

Ad

Differance is a play on the French verb differer, which means both “to defer” and “to differ.” Derrida uses both of these meanings to describe his concept. With words, Derrida suggests, the meaning is always “deferred” as a single word cannot give a complete description. A word needs other words to give it context; therefore its meaning is deferred until more information is given. One example of the “defer” argument is the word “house.” On its own, the word gives an incomplete definition. If you say “my house,” “White House,” or “dog house,” the picture becomes more complete.

In the second description of the term, “to differ,” Derrida claims that specific words are used to differentiate specific ideas. “House,” for example, brings up a different picture than alternate words with similar meaning, such as “shack” or “mansion.” The specific words we use have an effect on the picture we create, causing it “to differ” from anyone else’s version of the same picture.

Derrida introduced the concept of differance in his book, Speech and Phenomena, in a discussion of philosopher Edmund Husserl. The concept of differance was one Derrida continued to explore, expanding its meanings in interviews and essays. Differance is also intricately connected to Derrida’s philosophical theories of deconstruction, which basically states that there is no fixed universal viewpoint, and meaning shifts based on individual perspective.

Stanley Fish, one of the developers of Reader Response Criticism, also used the term to describe how individual readers or groups of readers, might have very contrary readings of a text. For example, there are readers who view Huckleberry Finn as an anti-slavery tale, that offers a strong argument for emancipation of slaves. Other readers, or other discourse communities, feel the tale is exactly the opposite, and have worked intensely to have the book banned from libraries, and high school reading lists. How each word is taken, read, or understood is going to make extraordinary difference in final analysis. According to Derrida, all interpretations are valid, though they can create frustration among users of the same word or words.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

anon944319
Post 3

Differance doesn't have any meaning and is not a concept either - that's the whole point. The lack of concept of the unreachable non-concept is what he's pointing out. Some people try to argue that the simple fact that he has made people aware of this lack of meaning has given differance meaning and turned it into a concept. But it only relies on the meaning of other things that relate to it which in turn do not actually have any meaning by themselves so therefore it's an infinite regression back to something unknown which can never be understood or even conceptualized because it's beyond our comprehension.

We cannot understand it because of what it is. We only understand things in

relation to other things and in self evidence but there is no self evidence in the web of language (signs) that we use as signifiers to process and give meaning to the empirical and ontological world. We are restricted by the infinitely self-contained system that we use to exist and express as we do.

It's actually very similar to the search for God (not the religious sense). There is no possible way for us to even imagine what or how or where or who or whatever God (if there is one) actually is because we anthropomorphosize the whole thing. We can only know from our experience, so when we're talking about God, we're only talking about understanding something from our limited knowledge base, so hence there is no possible way for us to imagine or even give a true concept of what it is we're even trying to answer. Like differance, God cannot be a concept, nor can it be a non-concept. But the simple fact that I just said that shows the exact limitations of what I just said.

Certlerant
Post 2

In Asian languages, one word can have countless meanings. As a result, subtle differences in tone and vocal inflection indicate meaning.

In addition, each character in written Japanese or Chinese represents one concept, but the overall meaning of the name, word or phrase can change completely when another is added.

Glasis
Post 1

Although the meaning of the word differance may be unclear, which may have been the intention of Derrida, the concept behind it is strong.

In cognitive and language development, a variety of factors influence how we speak and how we perceive the world around us, including geographical location, social standing and educational opportunities, to name just a few.

As a result, we learned to use adjectives, adverbs and modifiers to better describe our surroundings and experiences.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email