Category: 

What Is Derivational Morphology?

Article Details
  • Written By: Mark Wollacott
  • Edited By: Lauren Fritsky
  • Last Modified Date: 14 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Snake charmers get snakes to “dance” because of the movement of their flute-like instruments, not their music.  more...

December 4 ,  1945 :  The United States Senate approved of US participation in the United Nations.  more...

Derivational morphology is a process where one word is changed into another. The process takes a word stem like ‘national’ and adds a prefix, suffix or infix to make a new word such as ‘international’ or ‘nationality.’ The word fragments added to the stem word are called morphemes, hence morphology. There are many common morphemes in English. Such changes in derivational morphology are used to convert nouns, adjectives and verbs into one another.

Using an existing word to make a new word is called derivation. The term occurs because the meaning of the new word derivates from and away from the original meaning. It is separate from inflection, which adds additional letters, not morphemes, to a word to change its grammatical function. In this sense, changing ‘national’ to ‘nationalize’ is derivation, but turning ‘nationalize’ into ‘nationalizing’ or ‘nationalized’ is inflection and not derivation.

There are many derivational morphology combinations such as turning verbs into adjectives or nouns. Adjectives can be converted into adverbs, nouns, verbs and other adjectives. Nouns can be converted into verbs and adjectives. It is possible for each class to be converted into another word in the same class like ‘red’ and ‘reddish.’ The ability to convert one class of word into another class of word is a sign of the flexibility of English.

Ad

The term for converting an adjective or verb to a noun is called nominalization. This is a key part of derivational morphology. The adjective ‘national’ can become the verb ‘nationality.’ The verb ‘nationalize,’ itself a derivational morphology of ‘national,’ can be converted into ‘nationalization,’ a noun.

An adjective, during derivational morphology, becomes an adverb when ‘-ly’ is added to the stem word. This changes ‘ready’ into ‘readily’ and ‘slow’ into ‘slowly.’ Adjectives such as ‘slow’ can also become nouns during nominalization by adding suffixes such as ‘-ness’ to create ‘slowness.’ Adjectives such as ‘red’ can become verbs as well like ‘redden.’ Adjectives are one of the most flexible classes of word in derivational morphology.

Suffixes, prefixes and infixes perform a number of functions. The morphemes used to create such appendages to stem words rarely function as words by themselves. Some, such as ‘pro’ and ‘anti,’ became standalone words, but developed out of morphemes. Some affixes perform the same function as one another and some are preferred for some words, but not for others. For example, English has ‘atheist,’ but not ‘non-theist,’ and it has ‘polytheist,’ but not ‘multi-theist.’

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

lluviaporos
Post 2

@pastanaga - It is this general acceptance of of derivational morphemes and other new or borrowed words that makes English so wonderful for writers and poets.

I know that French, for example, is considered to be the "romantic language" but they have passed laws requiring no foreign words to be used in news print, at the risk of a fine. For example, the French can't talk about "email" which is a recently invented word in English anyway.

In fact does the prefix "e" count as a morpheme?

It must. It is one of the most common ways to create a derivation word at the moment then, because it seems like there are few activities that don't eventually get the "e" attached to them.

pastanaga
Post 1

There are quite a few of these which people get annoyed about and prefer to ignore. "Signage" springs to mind, and in fact there are a few words with the morpheme -age added to the end now that are still considered slang, or just bad grammar, but which I suspect will one day be considered "proper" English. I am guilty of doing this myself, but it is such a useful way of condensing what I mean to say "signage" rather than "lots of different kinds of signs".

This kind of flexibility is wonderful, because it is what allows English to continue to evolve to meet the needs of its speakers.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email