Category: 

What Is an Onerous Contract?

Article Details
  • Written By: Mary McMahon
  • Edited By: Shereen Skola
  • Last Modified Date: 21 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Snake charmers get snakes to “dance” because of the movement of their flute-like instruments, not their music.  more...

December 4 ,  1945 :  The United States Senate approved of US participation in the United Nations.  more...

An onerous contract is an agreement that offers more costs than benefits to one party. For example, a contractor might agree to build a home at a set price, only to have a spike in raw materials pricing drive the cost of construction past the expected earnings from the project. In accounting statements, onerous contracts need to be included as liabilities for a business, as they reflect expenses that must be met. These statements may include notes to discuss the type of contract and the situation, providing context for readers.

When contracts are established, both parties usually take steps to make sure they receive fair consideration from the deal. This may include a variety of forms of compensation including not just cash and assets, but also things like reputation; for example, someone might buy a florist in order to retain the name, along with getting the facility and all the equipment. Subsequent events can create an onerous contract, where one party has an excessive obligation.

Ad

Increases in raw material prices and changes to market conditions are examples. The obligated party needs to keep fulfilling the contract, even at personal cost. Examples can be seen in manufacturing, where companies may end up producing products and receiving less than they cost to make, or business, where companies might be stuck with a lease they cannot use. It would be too expensive to exit the contract, and activities like bankruptcy may not necessarily clear the obligation. Someone making installment payments on a business, for example, still needs to repay the seller if the company fails.

For accounting purposes, the handling of an onerous contract can vary, depending on the specifics of the situation. It may be considered a direct liability, as it involves an expense unavoidably incurred due to prior obligations. In the case of a lease, a company may be able to use asset impairment, arguing that the value of the lease has declined because the company can no longer use it, and thus it should be counted differently on financial statements.

Opinions from accounting authorities are available for companies deciding how to handle an onerous contract. Consistent handling is critical; accountants use decisions made by a single authority in order to prepare statements to ensure their accuracy and reliability. Once they decide how to handle an onerous contract, they need to continue to handle it in the same way, unless circumstances radically change.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

Logicfest
Post 2

@Terrificli -- different companies handle that problem in different ways, but most seem to rely on fuel surcharges. That simply means that both parties recognize that the price of fuel floats so the surcharge reflects the actual price of diesel fuel the trucking company incurred.

Terrificli
Post 1

The trucking industry has been dealing with this problem for years. Fuel prices are nothing if not volatile, and it makes sense that trucking companies simply can't afford to operate unless those prices are passed on to customers. Trucking, after all, operates on very thin margins -- competition is fierce so there is a lot of pressure to keep costs low. A sudden spike in fuel prices could sink a company.

How do they deal with rising fuel prices? Certainly they can't sit down and renegotiate a bunch of contracts every time that happens.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email