Category: 

What Is an Irregular Verb?

Article Details
  • Written By: Cynde Gregory
  • Edited By: PJP Schroeder
  • Last Modified Date: 23 August 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The U.S. Coast Guard led the evacuation of more than 500,000 people from Lower Manhattan on 11 September 2001.  more...

September 27 ,  1940 :  The World War II Axis powers formed with the signing of the Tripartite Pact.  more...

Every language has areas where it clings to the established rules and areas where it breaks them every chance it gets. In English, verbs do both. Regular verbs are well behaved whether they are describing something that happened in the past, the present, or the future. They comply the same way every time with the rules of conjugation. Irregular verbs, however, are the bad boys of action words because they take unexpected forms when speaking of the past.

It’s impossible to determine the exact number of verbs in any language at any given moment. Languages are really very fluid; speakers can coin a verb or use one that hasn’t be officially recognized and captured by a dictionary, and a verb can also vanish from popular parlance. Given that, linguists estimate between 25,000 and 100,000 verbs in English, or about 15% of the lexicon, might be in daily use. Of these, a fluent speaker needs to have a handle on an irregular verb only once in a while — 400 of them are all that are required for fluency.

Ad

It’s tempting to assume from these figures that the irregular verb collection in English is not something speakers need to be overly familiar with. That’s not entirely true as among the most commonly used verbs is likely to be an irregular one. Where would we be, after all, without the verb to be? It is not only an irregular verb in the past but in the present as well. Other common irregular verbs include have, eat, and do.

While most irregular verbs are actually pretty well behaved in the present tense, wearing the same endings as their entirely regular cousins, the verb to be is an exception. I am, but you are, and she is. This sets it apart from other irregulars. For example, I run, you run, and they run, while she runs follows the rules for present tense conjugation.

Regular verbs form a pretty predictable past tense by slapping on the ed morpheme. The basic past tense uses the same form as the past participle: I walked to the store last night is a single action that is finished, and I have walked to the store every night this week is the same verbal form coupled with have, making it a past participle. Many an irregular verb is irregular only up to a point, and once they’ve established their irregular forms, it remains the same with the past participle. I sold my house and I have sold several houses use the same form.

Other irregular verbs turn rule breaking into a fine art. These are the verbs that insist upon an irregular conjugation in the past. I swore I would learn English is the basic past, whereas I have always sworn I would learn English employs the past participle.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

Lostnfound
Post 2

@Grivusangel -- I think most people in every country are very gratified when a visitor attempts to speak their language, no matter how clumsy those attempts might be. There are exceptions, but in most of the places I've visited, the citizens seem very pleased that I'm trying to communicate with them in their language.

Still, I have to agree that irregular verbs are devilish. "Etre" in French is especially worrying. And then, in Spanish, there are two "be" verbs, depending on the kind of "being" you're talking about! And then "ir" is Spanish for "go." So what is "we go"? "Vamos"! That's about as irregular as it gets.

Grivusangel
Post 1

English does some of the things it does because it is such a borrowing language. For a language that is Germanic at its core, it borrows so much from the Romance languages, and this extends to the irregular verbs -- especially "be." I can't think of a single Romance language that has a regular "be" conjugation. In fact, even the German "be" conjugations aren't regular. They're not quite as bad as French or Spanish, but they are definitely irregular.

The saving grace is that most native English speakers understand how confusing our verbs are, and we are usually very understanding with non-native speakers.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email