An executive order is a specific power of the President and the executive branch as provided by the US Constitution in Article II, Section 1. This power allows the President of the United States (POTUS) the authority to create laws or determine how existing laws should be carried out. Executive orders always have to do with domestic affairs; executive agreements govern foreign affairs. Pretty much any issue in domestic affairs is fair game in an executive order except for those things that would impinge upon congressional powers, like the regulation of interstate commerce. Executive orders can be simple things like declaring a new National Holiday or a day designated to a special event. “Take your Child to Work Day” was created by executive order. Since William Clinton’s presidency, these noncontroversial orders have been given a new name — Presidential Decision Directives.
Not all executive orders are simple or ceremonial, and some put the President in direct conflict with Congress. Some famous executive orders of the past include President Eisenhower’s executive order to enforce the desegregation of schools. Sometimes states are, or Congress is, unwilling to enforce a law that is controversial, and under these circumstances, the President moves by executive order to see the law enforced. John F. Kennedy used executive orders in a manner similar to Eisenhower, to attempt to abolish discrimination based on race for people who sought jobs, housing, or equal pay.
While the power of the executive order seems broad, there are checks. One check is Congress's ability to overturn executive orders, much in the same way that it may overturn a presidential veto. A two-thirds vote of both houses (i.e., both the Senate and the House of Representatives) is required to overturn an executive order. This means that it can be extremely hard to overturn an executive order, since most members of Congress typically vote along party lines.
Another check to the broad power of the executive order is the Constitution. That is, the Supreme Court may review the order and weigh its constitutionality. Essentially both the legislative and judicial branches of the government have the potential power to check or dismiss an executive order, but their ability to do this may be based on the degree to which party affiliation of Congress or the courts aligns with the President.
Though use of this power has existed since the first President of the US took office, it remains a controversial one. It potentially gives the POTUS an opportunity to act in a very autocratic fashion, and checks and balances to the power through the legislative and judicial branches are only effective if these branches aren’t stacked with supporters of the president. It also gives the people of the US little recourse if they are unhappy with an order issued by the President, since they have no vote or say on which orders the POTUS can pass. The only recourse given to the people is to lobby their representatives in Congress to support defeating an order and to make certain they vote for a different presidential candidate in the next election.
|
anon161691
Post 6 |
Executive orders do not "always have to do with domestic affairs". G.W. Bush, for instance, signed an executive order forbidding overseas aid going to organisations that permitted or encouraged abortions in other countries, such as in Africa or South America. Therefore, the effect of this was felt overseas, although arguably it was done to placate/pander to the Christian Right. |
|
anon139645
Post 5 |
regarding the Supremacy Clause, The clause in United States Constitution's Article VI, stating that all laws made furthering the Constitution and all treaties made under the authority of the United States are the supreme law of the land. Chief Justice John Marshall interpreted the clause to mean that the states may not interfere with the functioning of the federal government and that federal law prevails over an "inconsistent" state law. |
|
anon130785
Post 4 |
Your information is incorrect. An executive order is not law. Congress only makes laws. Executive Orders (EOs) are legally binding orders given by the President, acting as the head of the Executive Branch, to Federal Administrative Agencies. Executive Orders are generally used to direct federal agencies and officials in their execution of congressionally established laws or policies. However, in many instances they have been used to guide agencies in directions contrary to congressional intent. The EPA was established by a Congressional Order. This is illegal by the Constitution but until a challenge is put forth to the Supreme court, it stays intact. |
| Related Topics | |
|
anon81838
Post 3 |
Look up the supremacy clause; the states are bound by federal law. States can't pick and choose which federal laws to abide by. Take a constitutional law class before you start to make stuff up. then at least you'd be able to sound a little authoritative. |
|
anon61325
Post 2 |
I believe another alternative available to the people is the 10th Amendment which allows the states to nullify any law that the states deem to be unconstitutional--the Supreme Court law notwithstanding. The intent of the Constitution was for the states to be another method to keep the general power in it's place. It is up to the people to have the state representatives reclaim the "right" that have been "silently" ceded to a centralist government. |
|
anon17263
Post 1 |
what is a legislative order? |