What is Adverse Possession?

business economy

Adverse possession is the occupation of property for an extended period of time, as defined by law, which is not legally owned by the person occupying the property. This is sometimes called squatting, or squatter’s rights. Clearly the property is unoccupied, and if a person lives at the property for long enough, 10-12 years in many states, they can come to own the property, even if they legally have no claim to it. Adverse possession can thus be said to be a means of acquiring land or homes, without ever having to pay for it.

It can’t be said that adverse possession is legal. In fact, the time of occupation prior to gaining the title of the property is specifically illegal. If the person actually owning the property chooses, he can have people who are squatting removed from the property and charged with trespassing. You really can’t just walk onto someone else’s property and claim it for your own without expecting legal repercussions. Further, in many cases, if you leave the property, you lose any time you have accrued toward adverse possession of the property.

Adverse possession, in order to be considered so, must fit three categories of definition. The person must physically possess the property in a visible and real manner. The person also mentally possesses the property, sometimes called hostile possession. This means the squatter or possessor restricts the use of the property by others. Lastly, the person’s possession of the property must be continuous. As stated above, you can’t leave the property for any period of time.

Most cases of adverse possession are fairly innocent ones, that don’t involve people squatting on land. A poorly drawn map of a person’s property that is incorrect can mean people feel they have a right to possess more land than they actually own. The wrong owner could fence off a small strip of land. If this goes unnoticed by the real owner of the land, and the possession is physical, hostile and continuous, then over time the person without the right to the specific property might own it by adverse possession.

If the real owner of the property realizes the mistake, he or she can go to court to gain full possession of owned property. Sometimes simply pointing out to the neighbor that the property they fenced is adversely possessed ends adverse possession. Often these issues over small patches of land are resolved when correct drawings of property lines are made, without any need for court resolutions. Alternately, if the real owner of the property really does not care about a tiny amount of land he or she may ignore the adverse possession of it, and allow the neighbor to gradually annex it through continuous occupation.

Homesteading laws, and mining rights were a way of acquiring property quite similar to that used in adverse possession. Over time, people could gain title to lands they built on, farmed, or mined, provided they stayed there for long enough. This is the one case where a fairly innocent type of adverse possession gives you title to land owned by the government. In most other cases, you can’t adversely possess government land. Each state has its restrictions in regard to government owned property.

Other cases of adverse possessions, where trespass is willful and clearly understood are less common. These may result when people abandon property. A person can move into an abandoned home and adversely possess it. They may even pay the taxes on the home to prove actual occupation of the property. In divorce settlements, adverse possession can play a factor in determining who acquires title to different types of owned property. If a person ignores the property laws regarding who owns what, they can gradually regain title to property they’ve had to split, by still possessing it.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


6
What about visual perception of property? In our case, nearly nine years ago when we bought our first home, there was established landscaping and a driveway off the 20' dirt road. A couple weeks ago our neighbor informed us that he owns most of what we perceived as our frontyard due to a parcel easement clause in our deed. Our bad I guess that we did not pay attention to that parcel II clause -- but we did not even consider it because of so many established elements of the property.

Is there anything we can do to keep the neighbor from tearing down the landscaping and widening the road to within 10 feet of our living room window?

- anon43770
5
>tracyk: I think it's the matter of 'easement'.
- anon43465
4
i have a legal matter that is really making life hard!! we have owned our property for over 6 years. the neighbor had their property surveyed and 3 feet of the end of our driveway is technically theirs. we can not move our driveway over the 3 feet because of a very big old tree. The neighbor did not have a problem with the 3 feet until we regraveled it. Then they decided to put a boulder there so we could not use it! the police came and had it moved.

Now they have contacted a lawyer and had a legal document sent to us that claims we have to stop using our driveway.So my question is, can they legally do this or is there some kind of law that allows us rights to our driveway since it has been this properties driveway for over 20 years? plaese help!!

- tracyk
2
The owner of the lot next door to me never filed a deed for the lot. In fact, a deed has never been filed on the lot at the county court house. I have tried to find/contact the owner by phone, registered letter, computer searches, etc., for the past twenty years. I recently found that even the tax assessor's office can not find the owner. We fenced off the lot and have maintained the property for the past twenty three (23) years, we have used the property as part of our circular driveway, and just recently paid the back taxes on the property for the past twenty (20) years. I understand that I can obtain ownership to the property by "Adverse Possession". My question is: What do I do to have the property actually deeded into my name?
- rthmkh
1
Can a lien holder pay taxes to protect his interest and then abandon his lien to take the property by Adverse Possession. Can the time period that the lien accrued be used as an element in Adverse Possession to meet the statutory time period required?
- rodfrank

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Tricia Ellis-Christensen
Last Modified: 01 September 2009

copyright © 2003 - 2009
conjecture corporation