I agree with the conjoining post here. Radical feminism is not a movement for liberation; it's a movement to conquer and crush the male half of the species.
I've seen "radical feminists" who claim that in order to be a true feminist you must, not just should, you must be a lesbian. And that to be attracted to men is abhorrent, evil and low.
Do they even realize that without men, none of us would exist? If their crusade was a success, our race would go extinct. And likewise the same vice versa.
Also, I consider myself a feminist.. But I am undoubtedly, unapologetically attracted to men. Even though I am asexual, I find them more visually appealing than females, and to force me to say that I like females better in order to support a cause that, in its native state, is righteous, is pretty damn ludicrous.
It's a slap in the face to male feminists as well, whom we should rightfully appreciate and welcome with open arms. Male feminists are living proof that the cause is working. So, to automatically discount them simply because of a sack of flesh dangling between their legs is just stupid.