What is a Non-Compete Agreement?

business economy

Non-compete agreements are often drafted as part of a basic employment contract, or are included as a separate document that is reviewed and signed at the beginning of a term of employment. Essentially, the non-compete agreement ensures that upon the termination of the employment period, the former employee will not engage in activities that place him or her in direct competition with their former employer. While the exact terms of a non-compete agreement may vary and are subject to local laws regarding employment, the non-compete agreement is generally an effective means to ensure that former employees do not make use of proprietary information to lure away customers and thus damage their former employer.

Most non-compete contracts will usually specify a specific time frame that the former employee is expected to refrain from engaging in employment that will place him or her in direct competition with a former employer. Generally, the time frame ranges from one or two years to up to five years. There are two basic reasons for this strategy. First, even if the individual had intimate knowledge about the inner workings of the company, that knowledge becomes increasingly obsolete over time. Second, the accuracy of such important matters as the contact information for the top ten clients of the company will also decrease with time. The end result is a former employee who is not able to utilize proprietary information to steal away customers and thus hurt the profitability of the company.

In many instances, the non-compete agreement is contained as a section or clause in the larger employment contract. State laws will often come into play in determining what types of provisions may be legally included. For instance, in a right to work state, a former employee could not be prevented from going to work for a competitor, although the former employee would be open to litigation if he or she contacted customers of the corporation for the purpose of luring their business away.

Also, the burden of proof is on the former employer to demonstrate that the terminated employee has taken any direct action that has resulted in a loss of profit or credibility to the company. This means that an individual who worked in Sales for Company A, but left and took a sales job with Company B in the same industry may very well be able to do so in spite of having signed a non-compete agreement. As long as the employee does not contact entities that were customers of Company A during his or her time with the company, and does not use his or her knowledge about the rates, marketing plans, or internal working of Company A, it would be virtually impossible to prove that Company A has suffered at the hands of the former employee.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category



Discuss this Article

The company I work for failed to get a winning bid. There were 3 companies that put a bid in for a contract with the state of KY. The one I work for lost and now says that we(the employees) do not have a job, that we can file for unemployment, and due to a "non compete form" cannot work for the company with a winning bid. The company that won the bid has already said that they would re-hire us(the 6 workers). The head person of the over all site had put in the agreement with the new company her wishes to keep us(the old workers) on the site. The cause was maintaining a level of normalcy within the compound. Would an agreement(the non-compete form) be liable since we, the workers, would not be competing with the former employer?
- anon32253
I work for a homehealth agency as a social worker and a marketer. I signed a non-compete which I was told that it was for marketing only. I am leaving this company and going to work for another homehealth company as a social worker. My old employer is saying that I can not do that due to the non-compete. Can you help me?
- anon26836
Whether that is the case or not depends on two things. First, the exact verbiage used in the non-compete clause of the agreement that is currently in force. If it precludes the type of arrangement you have in mind, then contractually your erstwhile agents are correct. However, there is the matter of current laws governing non-compete agreements in your state or province. If you and the company are both located in a right to work state, it may be impossible to enforce the non-compete clause anyway. If you know an attorney who is well versed in corporate law in your area, have him or her take a look at the clause before you proceed.
- mdt
I recently sold my real estate company some of my former agents. I would like to list my house with them under a Exclusive Agency Contract which will enable me to sell the house myself without owing any commission the the firm. I would pay for advertising under the company banner and even give them any prospects that I receive, but they feel that I am in violation of the non compete clause in our contract. I don't think I am since I am offering them prospects and free advertising. What do you think?
- ssreltd

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Malcolm Tatum

copyright © 2003 - 2009
conjecture corporation