Category: 

What is a Grant-In-Aid?

Article Details
  • Written By: Mary McMahon
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 25 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The mongoose was introduced to Hawaii in order to kill rats, but mongooses hunt in the day, while rats are nocturnal.  more...

December 7 ,  1941 :  Japanese bombers attack Pearl Harbor.  more...

A grant-in-aid is a grant from a national government to a regional government, as for example from the British government to the City of London. Grants-in-aid are usually used to provide funding for projects which regional governments are reluctant or unable to fund. In addition to being given to governments, they can also be given to agencies, institutions, and individuals, as long as it can be demonstrated that the funds will be used for a public service project.

Regional governments are expected to raise a lot of their operating costs on their own, but national governments are also aware that some projects are too large for regional governments to handle. A grant-in-aid is used when the national government does not want to handle the administration of the project, but simply to make funds available for the purpose of doing the project. However, money is not handed out with no strings attached.

A regional government may be required to meet certain standards for a grant-in-aid. For example, before being given grants to cover repair, maintenance, and expansion of public roads, a regional government might have to agree to provide reports about accidents and other incidents which happen on the road. Likewise, a regional government which wants money to subsidize housing for low income residents might be required to maintain demographic statistics which the government can use, or may be required to screen all applicants in accordance with national guidelines.

Ad

Block grants are general grants-in-aid, while a categorical grant is a grant-in-aid which has been earmarked for a very specific purpose. For example, a city could apply for a community development block grant which could be used to fund a variety of community projects which would benefit the community in some way. Conversely, it could also apply for a categorical grant-in-aid which would cover the construction of a new bridge.

These grants are used to fund activities which will benefit the public. This can include direct public assistance such as programs which are intended to provide services to low income people, or the funding of research and development which will have long term benefits. For example, a grant-in-aid provided to a university for cancer research benefits public health, but also provides employment for researchers and support staff, which in turn benefits the local economy. In addition, adding research programs to a university enhances its reputation, which can also provide positive impacts for the local community.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

starrynight
Post 2

@JessicaLynn - I actually don't really like this idea. I think that states need to be more independent from the federal government. Giving a state money for something, and then basically creating stipulations about using it, is just another way the federal government asserts their authorities over states.

Also, I noticed in the article that sometimes a grant-in-aid is given if the local government is "reluctant" to fund a certain project. Maybe there's a reason they are reluctant! I think in those kinds of cases, the federal government should just mind their own business and leave the situation alone!

JessicaLynn
Post 1

A grant-in-aid sounds like a win-win situation to me. The county or other area gets their money, but the federal government doesn't have to oversee the entire project.

I think this sounds like it could be a great option for things that are better organized on the state level like roads. The state is better equipped to know what needs to be done to the roads, but might not have the money to fund it.

It also makes sense that the regional government should have to report on what is being done with the money. I don't see the federal government just giving money to the state and then forgetting about it!

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email