Feedback About wiseGEEK Login
What is a Dichotomy?
Article Details
  • Written By: S.E. Smith
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2012
    Conjecture Corporation
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
 more...

A dichotomy is a split into two parts which are considered to be either contradictory or mutually exclusive. For example, the colors black and white represent a classic dichotomy: either something is black, or it is white, with no room for overlap or alternatives. Dichotomies are used in a number of ways and in an assortment of fields, from philosophy to biology, and learning to think about dichotomies can be important. It is also a good idea to learn to identify a false dichotomy; a dichotomy which is not, in other words, a true dichotomy.

The word is derived from the Greek dichotomia, which means “splitting in two.” Humans have obviously been using dichotomies for centuries, as they can be valuable tools for quickly identifying things and thinking about the world, although the danger of dichotomies is that they can quickly lead to oversimplification. This issue has been a common topic of discussion in many fields for thousands of years.

In biology, dichotomies are often used in keys, tools which are used to help people identify things. For example, a plant key might help people identify plants with a series of questions like “are the stems green?” Such a key is known as a “dichotomous key,” and these keys can be quite reliable when well designed, as they neatly rule out options until the user is left with one solid identification. There are numerous other applications of dichotomies in fields like engineering, astronomy, economics, and so forth, and in some fields the word has a special meaning.

A well known example of a false dichotomy is the saying “you're either with us or against us.” In this case, the dichotomy leaves out a third option, neutrality, setting up an “us vs. them” mentality which can be very dangerous. Such flaws in logic are often used in arguments, in the hopes of brow beating an opponent into conceding a point by setting up a false dichotomy and thereby forcing the issue. As a general rule, something is a false dichotomy when its elements are not mutually exclusive or contradictory, or when some other option or concept is left out.

Learning to identify false dichotomies in politics can be extremely useful. For example, a politician running for office might say “we need better roads, therefore we need to raise taxes.” This of course leaves out the option of re-allocating existing funds, or of using funds in a more efficient way. The gross-over simplification of the issues is a trait common to many politicians, who want to encourage people to vote for them, along with their policies.

Related Videos

Discuss this Article

anon139539
Post 4
Here's another political fallacy that I don't see mentioned here: "We have to overhaul the health care system or it will add to our deficits!"

Forcing people to buy health insurance or be fined, or force someone to purchase insurance for someone else (people who are taxed and their tax dollars underwriting insurance policies for those that can't afford to purchase insurance) will not bring down our deficits at all, and furthermore it drives up the cost of health insurance for the rest of us.

I see two comments relating to Bush, but the biggest perpetrator of the dichotomy in recent history is barry obama. Anyone who disagrees with me is a fool, and that is no fallacy in reasoning either.

GiraffeEars
Post 2
@ Babalaas- Politicians use all kinds of fallacious arguments, and you are right, a skillful politician uses these fallacies with great success. One of the most glaring examples of a false dichotomy or excluded middle fallacy is the argument that sold the patriot act to the people of the United States. It is much easier for a politician to drum up support if you can create the false dilemma that there are only patriots and terrorists.

The argument forced people into a sticky situation. If you fell pray to this false dilemma then you believed either people supported their country or they supported terrorist organizations. There was no option to be an American that enjoyed the right to privacy, yet still loved his or her country.

Babalaas
Post 1
Politicians often use rhetoric and rhetorical fallacies to create false dichotomies. Some of the best politicians are able to create false dichotomies that trap their opponents, and win over public support. The false dichotomy creates a sense of urgency for the audience. It can be emotionally moving, and create the illusion that there are only two options. When skillfully used, a false dichotomy will make the option the orator supports the most favorable option.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

please enter the following code:

Login

username
password
forgot password?
or connect with facebook

Register

username
password
confirm
email