Feedback About wiseGEEK Login
Category: 
What is a Cafeteria Catholic?
Article Details
  • Written By: S.E. Smith
  • Edited By: Bronwyn Harris
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2012
    Conjecture Corporation
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The average American spends 87% of his or her time indoors.  more...

May 28 ,  1999 :  Da Vinci's "The Last Supper" went back o  more...

A cafeteria Catholic is a member of the Catholic faith who chooses to ignore certain aspects of Catholic doctrine, or to interpret established doctrine in a way which does not agree with Catholic moral teaching. The term can also be used to refer to people in other Christian sects, with people substituting the name of the relevant sect for “Catholic.” As a general rule, people do not use this term to refer to themselves, because “cafeteria Catholic” is a pejorative phrase which is meant to imply disapproval.

The term is a reference to cafeteria style dining, in which people pick and choose the foods they want. The implication is that a cafeteria Catholic simply picks aspects of Catholic doctrine which appeal the most, rather than taking the whole package. Unlike a cafeteria, however, Catholicism is not a pick and choose religion: although people may debate certain aspects of faith, certain things are taken to be undeniably true.

Cafeteria Christianity is obviously an ancient issue, as the abundance of Christian sects amply testifies. Drastic differences in opinions have led to repeated splits in the Christian faith, ranging from the Great Schism to the Reformation, and members of these various sects all believe that their interpretation of Christianity is correct and true. Within a sect, people who pick and choose doctrine are often chastised as cafeteria Christians.

Many issues come up again and again for cafeteria Catholics, such as the right to choose, the use of birth control, ordination of women, sanctioning of homosexual relationships, approval of marriage for priests, and acceptance of divorce. No matter what cafeteria Catholics think, these issues are all addressed in Catholic doctrine, and failure to adhere to doctrine can make someone a “Catholic in Name Only (CINO)” in the eyes of Catholics who toe the doctrinal line.

Many cafeteria Catholics believe in most aspects of Catholic faith, struggling with major sticking points like those listed above. Some back up their beliefs with citations from Scripture and Catholic doctrine, despite the fact that Catholic church leaders such as His Holiness the Pope have clearly spoken out on such issues. Critics of cafeteria Catholics argue that they should find Christian sects which align more closely with their personal beliefs, rather than trying to manipulate Catholicism to adhere to their opinions.

It should be stressed that being a cafeteria Catholic doesn't necessarily make someone a bad Christian. Many cafeteria Catholics are devout and moral individuals who believe in the majority of Christian doctrine, and with a bit of searching, they may be able to find Christian sects which are more suitable for them. If someone is called a cafeteria Catholic, he or she may want to seek counseling from a religious leader to discuss his or her faith.

Related Videos

Discuss this Article

BigBloom
Post 4

@Armas1313

I think you may have missed an important point in @arod2b42's statement: there are doctrines which should be seen on a graded absolutism. Certain doctrines are ultimately important, and other should be seen as less important. If we recognize and hold to these central doctrines: forgiveness, love, redemption, etc., then we won't need to squabble on all the others. We also will not need to just "live and let live," but can actually recognize mutuality and not be caught up in a mere soft "tolerance."

Armas1313
Post 3

@arod2b42

Maybe this would be a good scenario: people choose to live and let live, and not start religious wars based on their belief system. So much bloodshed has come because of minor doctrines which have caused massive schisms. Wars of religion have destroyed nations and lives. I think it is time to recognize that we need to move on from history's mistakes.

arod2b42
Post 2

I think that choosing to pick and choose doctrines must come with a sober assessment of how central certain doctrines are to a faith. For instance, you cannot be a Cafeteria Catholic if you choose to omit the resurrection of Christ. If you omit that doctrine, you are not a Catholic at all. Cafeteria religions are all very close to autonomy and post-modernism, which holds the doctrine of "tolerance" as supreme. This ideal of tolerance states that all religions are equally true and good as long as you don't try to "impose" them on other people. Religions will not survive if such a tolerance reigns supreme, because everybody will be the same and believe whatever they want.

averagejoe
Post 1

"Cafeteriaism" ;) is not only something that affects Catholicism. There is Cafeteria Judaism, Cafeteria Christianity (as the article states), Cafeteria Islam. Put simply, there is Cafeteria Religion. And, I don't know that that is such a bad thing. To think that one, long and complex religion makes sense to so many people seems illogical; rather, it seems more logical that some aspects make sense and work for some people. Moreover, it seems nearly impossible to adhere to *all* of Judaism's tenets, for example, so to pick and choose the important ones seems completely logical and good.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?
or connect with facebook

Register

username
password
confirm
email