Learn something new every day
More Info... by email
The phrase “remember the Maine” refers to the explosion of the battleship Maine in Havana harbor in Spanish-controlled Cuba. This phrase was used to create enthusiasm in America for a war with Spain. It was widely employed by the press operations of early newspaper barons such as William Randolph Hearst, known generally for “yellow,” or biased, journalism. “Remember the Maine” was very effective in stirring popular sentiment, and the slogan likely contributed to America’s decision to pursue war with Spain.
The battleship Maine was sent to Havana in 1898 to make a diplomatic point. Cuba had been in rebellion against Spain since 1895, and the United States wanted to make its political and military presence felt in the region. In part, this was a natural extension of the well-established American policy codified by the Monroe Doctrine. Under that doctrine, the United States claimed the right to prevent European involvement in the affairs of nations in the Americas. This was also the golden age of European imperialism, and many Americans wanted to secure an empire for the United States, perhaps one that included Cuba.
As it was resting at anchor in Havana harbor, the Maine exploded in the middle of the night of February 15, 1898. The ship soon sank, and over half of its crew perished in the explosion. The cause of the explosion is still unknown, although an accident is now considered the most likely explanation by historians. Other scholars believe that Spain was responsible or even that the ship was deliberately sabotaged to provoke a war, but no firm consensus exists.
At the time, however, Americans assumed that the explosion was caused by an attack on the part of Spanish forces. The phrase “Remember the Maine,” which was often followed by “to hell with Spain”, was repeated widely in the American press. Many ordinary Americans, who had been ambivalent about the idea of war with Spain to gain imperial territory or to liberate Cuba, were persuaded by this war propaganda that conflict was necessary.
American newspapers of the day were far from neutral in the lead-up to war. Most of the nation’s major papers were owned by newspaper tycoons, and these men favored a policy of imperialism. They realized early on that the destruction of the Maine could be a very powerful rallying cry, and much of the force behind the movement to remember the Maine stemmed from their efforts. This is seen by some scholars as one of the first instances of the modern approach to war propaganda that became ubiquitous during the World Wars.
The United States did opt to pursue war with Spain. Enthusiasm created by the cry of “Remember the Maine” aided in recruitment efforts and ensured broad initial support for the war. Spain was quite weak at this time, and the United States swiftly prevailed. America acquired a variety of colonial possessions, most notably the Philippines, and secured a friendly and independent Cuba.
I grew up hearing about the Maine and the Spanish-American War, but I never knew the controversy behind it. I always believed it was Spanish sabotage, and the US had every right to go to war over the incident. It was just like the Alamo or Pearl Harbor or Fort Sumter-- all good reasons why we needed to take military action. Now I'm finding out that the cause was more ambiguous, and Hearst wasn't interested in reporting the truth.
In many ways, the yellow journalism behind "Remember the Maine" really dealt a blow to the legitimate news reporting industry. Newspapers were supposed to remain as objective as possible, only reporting what facts they could confirm independently. But Hearst and others didn't want to operate under those restrictions, so he basically invented the news he thought would sell more papers.
You can still see this sort of "yellow journalism" with all of the 24 hour cable news shows. The same basic story can be covered 5 different ways, depending on the political slant of the news channel's owner. Sometimes a headline can be slanted to make certain politicians look better or worse. Personally, all of this slanted and biased reporting makes me sick.
One of our editors will review your suggestion and make changes if warranted. Note that depending on the number of suggestions we receive, this can take anywhere from a few hours to a few days. Thank you for helping to improve wiseGEEK!