Category: 

What Does "Read the Riot Act" Mean?

An individual may be "read the riot act" or receive an oral reprimand for conducting rude and rowdy behavior.
The idiom "to read the riot act" has origins in a law passed in Britain during the year 1714 as a way of suppressing unruly groups of people.
Article Details
  • Written By: Mary McMahon
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 15 December 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
Eating and drinking can be beneficial for both colds and fevers.  more...

December 22 ,  1978 :  China began massive economic reforms.  more...

The idiom “to read the riot act” is used to describe a firm oral reprimand given to someone or a group. For example, one might say “after she read the riot act to the boys for clowning around, they settled down.” Rowdy behavior, rambunctiousness, or rudeness could all be viewed as causes for someone to be reprimanded, sometimes in front of other people to enforce the idea that the warning is indeed serious.

This slang term has its origins in the Riot Act of 1714, a law passed in Britain for the purpose of suppressing civil unrest. During this period in Britain, mobs would regularly gather to protest the government and incite anti-government behaviors. While some mobs started out relatively calmly, with people making speeches and talking among themselves, they sometimes grew out of control. The government also wanted to suppress the appearance of such mobs with the goal of solidifying the position of the king, fearing that the monarchy would be undermined by these gatherings.

Ad

In response, Parliament passed the Riot Act. Under the Riot Act, any group of 12 or more people could be deemed a “mob,” and if a magistrate literally read the Riot Act to the mob, they were legally obligated to disperse. Failure to disperse after an hour could be grounds for imprisonment, hard labor, or fines. As one might imagine, the penalties for violating the Riot Act were an incentive for groups to meet in secret so that they would not be caught, and to disperse quickly to avoid penalties.

Well through the 1800s, magistrates used the Riot Act to control unruly groups. By the 1840s, the Riot Act was falling out of favor, although it was not officially repealed until 1973. Along the way, it inspired the slang term, thereby becoming enshrined in the English language, although many modern English speakers are unaware of its history.

The first uses of the phrase in an idiomatic sense date to the early 1800s, right around the time when use of the Riot Act as a tool of discipline declined. Many Britons were familiar with the Riot Act, so it is perhaps not surprising that it came to be used in a joking idiom. Today, when someone is read the riot act, the goal is usually to reprimand him or her for negative behavior, encouraging an apology and a promise not to repeat the behavior.

Ad

More from Wisegeek

You might also Like

Discuss this Article

anon981913
Post 4

I was at a student demonstration one time where the police captain actually read us the Riot Act, or at least words to that effect. Because we failed to leave the parking lot in an "expeditious manner", we were all considered in violation of city laws against loitering for malicious purposes. The next step would have been tear gas if we didn't leave in the next ten minutes. Most of us did leave voluntarily, but a few people stayed around to test the police. They got put in handcuffs and booked into the city jail for about 12 hours.

Rico
Post 3

From the historic background, it can be argued that the riot act was essentially a tool used to oppress. Mobs seldom gather unless there's something they unhappy about and if such issues are addressed with sincerity there will hardly be cases of civil unrest, let alone the need to use legal means to quell them.

Denha
Post 2

it always amuses me to know where the many idioms in our language come from. Knowing "read the riot act" originates in an actual Riot Act makes the entire saying make much more sense now.

elizabeth23
Post 1

Even without the historical context, I have always had the idea that when someone tells a story that begins or ends with änd then they read me the riot act", someone involved was doing something out of line. However, sometimes the "reader" is more at fault than the "rioter", as is always the case with reprimands.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email