Category: 

What Does It Mean to Be "Left in the Dark"?

Article Details
  • Written By: A. Leverkuhn
  • Edited By: Andrew Jones
  • Last Modified Date: 29 November 2016
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2016
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
President Richard Nixon had an entire speech prepared in case the Apollo 11 astronauts became stranded on the Moon.  more...

December 8 ,  1965 :  Pope Paul VI promulgated Vatican II into ecumenical law.  more...

The English idiomatic phrase, “left in the dark,” refers to someone being unaware of a certain situation, or ignorant of certain factors. This is one of many similar phrases that use the metaphor of visual darkness for secrecy or lack of awareness. If someone is being left in the dark, he or she is not being informed about something when they should be.

English has many different phrases that use the same metaphor, and another common one is the use of the phrase “kept in the dark.” Although the meaning for this phrase is similar, when an English speaker says that someone is kept in the dark, this implies an deliberate effort to hide information or deceive the party, where being left in the dark is a condition of simply being passively uninformed. English speakers can use other phrases to cover other aspects of the same metaphor; for instance, if no one with inside information “sheds any light” on a subject, then everyone is “left in the dark” about it.

In general, the concept of shedding light on an issue relates to bringing out the truth in a certain matter. By the same token, English speakers also talk about “operating in the shadows” which again, refers to secrecy or discrete action. English speakers might also say someone acted “like a thief in the night” to indicate that someone did something with the intention of complete secrecy.

Ad

Other highly idiomatic phrases also relate to the use of light and darkness, or loss of sight as lack of knowledge. For example, when a group of people is “left in the dark” about something, there’s the idea of a whole group lacking knowledge and making ill-informed decisions. Another way to say this is to allude to the group of people “playing a game of blind man’s bluff.” In this classic game, one of the participants is blindfolded and cannot see. In the idiomatic phrase, the speaker is making a comparison of that one blindfolded person to the whole roomful of people, saying that all of them are “blind” to certain information, and thus operating “blindly.” These sorts of colorful expressions help speakers to talk more passionately and vividly about how a lack of knowledge can affect a group of people.

Ad

You might also Like

Recommended

Discuss this Article

Ruggercat68
Post 1

I think some people get "left in the dark" because they can't be trusted with knowledge. Even if they serve no purpose in the conspiracy, there's every chance they will report it to authorities or publicize it or whatever. There's probably a degree of protection, as well. If a prominent person, like the governor of a state, were left in the dark about a political retaliation plan, then he or she can always claim plausible deniability.

I don't know if I'd feel worse about being "kept in the dark" or "left in the dark". Being kept in the dark would feel more deliberate, like the conspirators didn't trust me to look the other way. A lot of people could be left in the dark about a secret project, but not out of any malice or distrust.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email