Category: 

What Does "Duces Tecum" Mean?

Duces tecum is common used in terms of a subpoena duces tecum.
Article Details
  • Written By: Mary McMahon
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 05 October 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2014
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
The CDC reported that eight foods, including peanuts and milk, account for 90% of food allergies.  more...

October 25 ,  1971 :  The United Nations expelled Taiwan and admitted China.  more...

The phrase “duces tecum” is Latin for “bring with you.” It is most commonly seen in the sense of a subpoena duces tecum, a formal summons which orders someone to bring materials to court or face punishment. This can be compared with a subpoena ad testificandum, which compels someone to go to court to provide testimony for a case. A subpoena duces tecum can be issued to one of the parties in a case or to someone who is believed to have materials which may be relevant to the case.

When someone is served with a subpoena duces tecum, the document must include a clear description of the types of materials which need to be brought to court. Parties to a case are not allowed to utilize a subpoena duces tecum to “go fishing” for evidence. The document must be issued to someone with a reasonable belief that he or she is holding documents or other materials which could be important in the case.

Privilege applies to certain people issued with such a subpoena. Under attorney-client privilege, for example, an attorney can withhold a number of documents including materials used to prepare for the case. Likewise, doctor-patient privilege comes into effect in these situations and certain other communications may be protected as well. If there is a belief that turning materials over would violate privilege, the target of a subpoena can consult a lawyer for advice.

Ad

The subpoena duces tecum can also be used to obtain evidentiary material from people who are summoned to attend a deposition. The target is asked to bring the material along to the deposition for examination. Not all of the evidence collected in this way will be used in court, but it can help to build a case and may provide information which could be highly relevant to the arguments which will be used in court to defend or prosecute a case. It should be noted that the rules of discovery apply to materials obtained under a subpoena duces tecum.

In some regions courts have made an effort to remove Latin from legal terminology, using plain language to make the nature of a legal activity clear to someone who may not be familiar with Latin. The widespread use of Latin in legal terms is unlikely to vanish entirely in languages such as English, however, especially given that so many Latin words are already in use in English.

Ad

More from Wisegeek

You might also Like

Discuss this Article

hamje32
Post 2

@nony - I believe that it’s the job of the attorney to ferret out anything that the client may have which could impact the case one way or another; if it’s later found out that the attorney had evidence which could have affected the outcome of the case and didn’t volunteer it, that’s enough to cause the entire case to be retried. That’s my understanding away.

I’ve seen TV shows where someone was convicted of a crime and later found to be innocent because of exculpatory DNA evidence. It was then shown that the prosecution had this information all along but didn’t volunteer it. That’s a big no-no. I imagine you could be held in contempt of court for doing something like that.

nony
Post 1

I’ve been in court cases before – I was a juror – and the rules of civil procedure are pretty strict. Basically the idea is that no side should fear being surprised by new evidence at the trial. This is the way that they play fair in the judicial system; at least that’s the way that it’s supposed to work.

If the prosecutor has evidence, the defense should also have been briefed on that evidence. I saw that too in the trial; the judge wanted to ensure that both sides in the case had seen the evidence so that they knew what they were dealing with.

This is what’s called discovery. The only thing that I’ve ever wondered is what happens if someone is summoned to bring a piece of evidence, a document or whatever that may have bearing on a case, but doesn’t volunteer any additional evidence that might affect the case?

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

Login

username
password
forgot password?

Register

username
password
confirm
email