2
Interestingly, the discussion of uncontrolled global population growth on the environment is at paucity levels. One article stated that over 40% of the cause of global warming is directly due to over population...(increased demand on earth's limited resources such as water; decreased forests that reduce the CO2 cleaning ability; increased clearing of land for population, farming, and "industrialization" growths). The other "corrective measures" to "global warming" and correlary "climate changes" account for less that 2% of the overall impact. Thus, even though recycling, reversal of the ozone layer destruction, and less reliance on fossil fuels are needed and contribute to the overall health of the planet...the biggest danger to the spaceship earth is "over population" and its associated impact on the earth's resources. So the question becomes: How do we control the world wide population growth?????
- anon1473
1
It's heartening to read, for a change, of solar activity being responsible for global warming, instead of the big, bad human population. Global warming has become a global economy, the result of green awareness being written into most western governments' policies. We are now tidier than ever before, doing our duty, recycling , energy-saving etc., because the man-made phenomenon has been touted by all major governments, the result, probably, of government-funded scientific research. Is science dancing to the tune of politics? Scientists who have "proven" that it's anthropogenic activities that have accelerated global warming in modern times are given a platform on which to stand. Yet global warming is as old as the earth itself. Read the previous input. If natural solar activity is driving global warming, then we've succeeded in tidying up our own backyards. If human industrialisation is the cause, then we've barely scratched the surface. Different coloured "wheelie" bins for recycling our rubbish is hardly going to make an impact against policies of enlargement (airports), developments (houses and supermarkets in almost every town) and new roads (the Aberdeen by-pass, for example). All will be built at the expense of green or brown spaces, where ecological succession would eventually have produced green plants, which would have naturally offset some carbon emissions. Think of this world wide. If global warming is solely down to mankind, then we need a huge shift in human consciousness to avert an ecological disaster.
- anon489