Is it Stealing to Use Someone Else's Wireless Internet Service?

internet computers

Using someone else's wireless service is indeed stealing, as it involves using a resource which someone else has paid for without paying for it. However, using someone else's wireless service may not always be totally unethical, especially if you talk about it with the person, and in some communities, anonymous strangers may actively promote the use of their wireless by leaving the network unprotected and inviting people to use it.

When someone orders wireless service, he or she must invest in a router and be prepared to pay monthly fees for access. Using someone else's wireless service may be free for the user, but not for the person who owns the account. And, while it can be tempting to take advantage of an unsecured network to save money, there are some disadvantages to using someone else's wireless service, both for the owner of the service and the user.

For owners, the clear disadvantage is that when people piggyback on their networks, it eats up bandwidth. This can make Internet service slow for the people who are actually paying for the network, which can be frustrating. In addition, if the service provider has a bandwidth cap or allowance, the service may be cut off if the allowance is exceeded, or an additional sum may be tacked onto the bill. Furthermore, people using the network could potentially access other computers on the network, if their users have set their computers to share data, and this could compromise the integrity of the computers themselves, as well as the data stored on them.

For someone who is using someone else's wireless service, the primary disadvantage is that the service could drop out of cut off suddenly, and the owner of the network may decide to boot piggybackers off the network through the administration software. It also leaves one's computer potentially vulnerable, as detailed above. Furthermore, in some regions, people can be prosecuted for theft of Internet service, and they may be required to pay fines, perform community service, or be penalized in some other way.

However, using someone else's wireless service isn't necessarily wrong. Sometimes neighbors may band together to share service, for example, in which case the bill may be split. Or, if you're having problems with your Internet service, you might ask a neighbor if you can use his or hers for a few days while the problem is resolved. In other cases, people who believe that Internet access should be available to all may leave their networks unsecured so that other people can access them.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category






  
  
	

		

New: Discuss this Article

Posted by: rleroygordon
The term for jjshapiro's comments is "self-aggrandizement." The writer can offer as many explanations and justifications and excuses as they'd like, but it's still totally wrong. So he does us the favor of repeatedly using the word "stealing". This, of course makes it all right: "Oh, well I know it's stealing but I'd try to find the owner if I could but I can't so I have to steal." Rubbish! Believe me, if someone was “stealing” like this from jjshapiro, he’d be complaining. "Reliable and honest?" Not by a long-shot. Reliable means trustworthy and dependable -- taking the responsibility of either finding an honest way of getting on the 'net, or doing without, however inconvenient that might be. And honest means not stealing -- however much someone might believe that their "honesty" somehow justifies their actions.
Posted by: screenwriter
Every thief once caught asks some version of that same question. Oh! Was I stealing? Me for one ain't buying; every thief is a liar, if only out of necessity!
Posted by: anon16812
How would jjshapiro feel if someone who didn't have their own car nearby just took jjshapiro's and used it just because they knew how to get into it and start it? Or how would jjshapiro feel if someone broke into jjshapiro's home while noone was there and used food from the fridge, the bed and the bathroom? In both these examples the person making use of jjshapiro's resources could claim that, at the time, they didn't have access to their own car or home. However, they would have options: public transport, cab or hotel being but three examples. jjshapiro when away from home has other ways of connecting to the internet; internet cafes being but one example. jjshapiro, it's time you stopped justifying your theft, and instead applied your thoughts and energies to either finding honest ways to access the internet or learn how to live without it while you are away from home. --posted by someone who is using their own wireless
Posted by: anon16796
it's a negative externality. some one is paying the money, and an unknown party is getting benefits. when flowers bloom in my garden which are pollinated by bees, my neighbors hive is getting expanded full of honey. money for him but his bees are pollinating unknown to my neighbor. thats how educated insects behave but my neighbor never look at my face because he has a fear that i would ask some help for him. -Tissa
Posted by: jjshapiro
I agree with this article in principle. But it doesn't cover the main situation in which I piggyback or steal someone else's wireless Internet access: when I am traveling and am in situations where I have no obvious way of connecting to the Internet but discover someone else's unsecured wireless network and have no idea whose it is or how I would contact the person to ask them if they would permit me to use their Internet connection or tell them that I was using it. For example, this very minute I'm stealing someone's wireless Internet connection, and, while most likely they are asleep and I'm not slowing down their own usage, I don't know who or where they are or how to contact them to ask them if I could pay them while I'm in my current location for a week. Also, I imagine that many people would act frightened if someone knocked on their door and asked for permission to use their service. And, since I'm a stranger, there would be no way for them to know that I'm a reliable and honest person, that I would never try to break into their system even if I knew how, and so on. So I think that, in order to be complete, your article ought to address this sort of situation.

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by S.E. Smith

copyright © 2003 - 2008
conjecture corporation