How Can We Solve World Hunger?

world

While the quest to solve world hunger permanently may be considered a pipe dream, there are things individuals and governments can do to address the current world hunger problem. Because the world has a finite amount of farmable land and a seemingly infinite new supply of inhabitants who will need to eat, solving world hunger often seems like an insurmountable challenge. However, new food technologies and improvements in the political climate can go a long way towards ending mass starvation and famine.

One way to solve world hunger would be to develop new ways to grow food on a worldwide scale. Many people today live in areas of the world which were never capable of producing sufficient food crops or are nearly impossible to irrigate. Some arable land remains underused because it is under the control of rogue governments or is currently too inaccessible for farming. By developing new methods for maximizing crop growth on substandard land, inhabitants can grow enough food to meet their needs.

Another way to solve world hunger would be to improve the food distribution infrastructure. A number of first-world countries have massive surpluses of staple crops and grains, especially wheat, rice and corn. These stockpiles are replenished regularly through subsidized farming. The problem is that poorer countries which could benefit from these surpluses are often controlled by hostile governments which either refuse offers of food or essentially hold the food hostage at vital distribution points.

If relief agencies and government services had better means for proper food distribution, the delivery of surplus food to famine-stricken areas would go a long way towards solving the problem of world hunger. Encouraging populations of poorer countries to move closer to sustainable sources of food would also solve world hunger, but this has proven to be difficult for sociological, religious and logistical reasons.

Creating new farming technologies could also help solve world hunger. If food can be grown in large hydroponic farms, for example, there would less strain put on traditional soil farms. Farmers in poorer countries could be trained to rotate their crops in order to keep the soil healthier season after season. Better seeds with higher yields or resistance to insect or weather damage could help farmers grow more usable crops on the same amount of arable land. A renewed emphasis on agriculture as a career could also encourage more young people to start their own farms and produce more food for others.

The problem of world hunger is always going to remain as long as the world population continues to be substantially higher than the amount of food that farmers are able to produce. Large scale efforts to control population growth have proven to be extremely unpopular and nearly impossible to enforce. Many organizations such as UNICEF have dedicated themselves to the eradication of world hunger and famine, but the only way to solve world hunger permanently would involve the unified efforts of thousands of agricultural experts and significant amounts of money and material support from hundreds of world leaders.

Related wiseGEEK articles

Category

wiseGEEK features

Subscribe to wiseGEEK


6
I think it's great and all looking at world hunger, but have you ever been to your local food bank? I think it's more important to help the people around you before you spread the love.
- anon52010
5
Greed and poverty are really the reasons for world hunger. if people weren't so greedy and kept all the money and food to themselves then there would be more money out there circulating and then other people would have a chance on getting it and then they able to buy the food and other necessary things of life.
- anon50185
4
This article is unnecessarily cynical, and contradictory. First, you correctly state that world hunger is largely caused by politics and poor distribution methods. Then, you allude to the myth that we don't have enough food.

"world hunger is always going to remain as long as the world population continues to be substantially higher than the amount of food that farmers are able to produce."

What does that even mean? The population is higher than the amount of food produced? As though there are more crops than people? I would assume you meant farmers are not able to produce enough food to feed the world's population, but that is simply not true. The vast majority of the world's food rots away, while a good number of the world's population starves anyway. And anyway, a lot of good land goes to waste and/or become urbanized... so, there really is no problem with not being able to produce enough food.

Anyway I agree with anon15601. Democratic socialism all the way.

- anon34333
3
I heard that Europe and the US spend 3 billion dollars a year on perfume! Imagine how much people that money could save!
- anon20622
2
hmmm...ever heard of "starving children in China?"
- anon15617
1
The problems of world hunger come not from a lack of food or resources. We have the resources to feed everyone in the world many times over. In fact many foods are overproduced and the surplus destroyed. Why? Because it would not be profitable to transport it to those who need it.

The system we live under, Capitalism, where commodities are produced and sold for profit rather than based on need, is the real problem. With a planned economy using resources properly and basing what is produced on need rather than what can turn a profit, world hunger could easily be confined to the dustbin of history.

For workers' control of the means of production under a Socialist, democratically planned economy!

- anon15601

FREE: Subscribe to wiseGEEK

 
    learn more

our strict privacy policy ensures that your email address will be safe



Written by Michael Pollick
Last Modified: 10 November 2009

copyright © 2003 - 2009
conjecture corporation