Feedback About wiseGEEK Login
Are the Best Artists All Crazy?
Article Details
  • Written By: Tricia Ellis-Christensen
  • Edited By: O. Wallace
  • Last Modified Date: 14 December 2011
  • Copyright Protected:
    2003-2012
    Conjecture Corporation
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog
 more...

Some artists, whether painters, writers or musicians, suffer from being labeled crazy artists. There is compelling evidence that some of the best artists do deserve the title, except the term "crazy" is generally more politely replaced with "mentally ill." There are numerous examples of “crazy artists” however, which do point to a large share of artists suffering from some form of mental illness.

Mental illness in "crazy artists" may create a number of factors that contribute to their artistic tendencies. The first of these is the polarizing effect on the artist. The artist who sees him or herself as "outside" of the general public because of a mental illness is likely to have a take on humanity quite different from the "inside" man or woman. In fact, being outside allows one to observe society as one might observe a society of birds for example. Core truths of the society can be exposed and thus resonate with, or irritate the public.

Additionally "crazy artists" have access, probably that they don’t want, to the excessive emotional content of their lives. This is very true of those with bipolar disorder or depression. Some cannot filter out the deep and foreboding emotions, causing great mental disturbance. Exposure to consistent emotional content can as well touch others listening to, observing or reading the art.

A few writers who could be termed "crazy artists" include Charles Dickens, Virginia Woolf, Leo Tolstoy, John Keats, Sylvia Plath, and Tennessee Williams. Many of these "crazy artists" fought tremendous battles with depression. Some like Plath committed suicide. Others who are potential candidates as "crazy artists" include the alcoholics and drug addicts, since it is now shown that many who have drug dependence are medicating to mask a mental disorder. These include writers like Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Wilkie Collins and Edgar Allan Poe.

Several visual artists have been surmised to have depression. This is certainly the case with Vincent Van Gogh, the poster child of "crazy artists." However, Michelangelo may also have been suffering from deep depression. Paul Gauguin can certainly be said to have been one of the "crazy artists" suffering a mid-life crisis, battling alcoholism and relocating to Tahiti to paint during the last few years of his life.

Great filmmakers have also been considered crazy artists, battling various forms of mental illnesses. Their ranks include Francis Ford Coppola and Rod Steiger. Further, actors and actresses have recently "come out" in proclaiming their status as "crazy artists." Patty Duke has been particularly effective in her advocacy for those with depression and bipolar disorder. Actresses like Vivien Leigh and Marilyn Monroe battled mental illness as well.

Music would not be the same without its contributing crazy artists. These names include: Mozart, Schubert, Rossini, Tchaikovsky, and Beethoven. Modern musicians like James Taylor have been relatively public about battling mental illness and drug addiction.

Perhaps the most illuminating work on the subject is the book The Dynamics of Creation by Anthony Storr. He refutes the idea that art springs from insanity but is instead a force of consolation to the artist. Another interesting take on the subject of "crazy artists" is the book The Key to Genius: Manic Depression and the Creative Life written by D. Jablow Hershman and Julian Lieb. This work analyzes how the manic depressive artist may achieve more recognition because in his/her manic states, production level increases dramatically.

Some worry, however, that insanity is a prerequisite of great art. This is clearly not the case, and there are many fabulous artists who were quite sane. Further, insanity does not translate to great art. However, interesting analyses have been made of art produced by people who are institutionalized.

Related Videos

Discuss this Article

galen84basc
Post 11
@anon231410 -- I totally get what you're saying, and you're right in that calling any group of people a derogatory name is bigoted and wrong.

I don't think that that is the intention of the article though -- if you notice, the term "crazy" is put in quotes throughout, so I don't think that the author was intending to be bigoted, but rather to just answer the stereotype of the "crazy artist".

anon231410
Post 10
I'm highly insulted by the term "crazy" when it is loosely thrown around in reference to a group of people oppressed biologically and by the community, especially when we are capable of great inspiration for the group as a whole. It's nothing less less than bigotry in a different form and is indicative of a lack of sophistication, education, and sensitivity.
anon146271
Post 8
it's more that great artists were depressed before becoming artists, not that artists become depressed. not for all artists, but many people who create or write great stuff were able to do so because they are not like the average person.

their mind is usually in a place deeper than the average person and their is such an intensity in their feelings about a certain topic that their mind takes them to a place that the average citizen cannot go to.

the crazy thoughts they think are stuff that an average person wouldn't have an inkling about, is when they come back down from that manic state that they can write such great stuff because their mind works so differently from the average person.

Related Topics
anon138411
Post 7
Maybe society in general may feel threatened by an artist's expressive outlet. This can lead to attacks by those in politics, religion, or the media. These attacks can alienate an artist into thinking they have a mental disorder.

If more people thought for themselves instead of having the media think for them, there could be a problem in controlling them. Why is it ok to watch movies on war and killing, but when one individual person reacts to it in his or her art, they are looked at like they are not right. Art can be looked at as a danger to a group that dosen't agree with a piece of art. These attacks can lead to depression or paranoid feelings.

It's too easy to say that these artists are crazy. They just respond and perceive things differently. And that can be a big problem to those who feel it is a threat to the good of society. Is it better to hurt someone or to paint a picture of your emotions so you can get past it.

I think the world would be better if everyone was trained in expressing themselves. But maybe not showing the public their art. For some art can have a negative influence on people and should be carefully selected. Maybe the ones who go about the day and watch t.v, go on the computer, play video games, tweet, twitter, and facebook are the ones with a mental disorder. It's all in how you perceive the world around you. But please don't be so quick to judge the good ones as crazy.

anon126309
Post 6
The sculptor Killian Skarr is probably the best example of an artist being "completely out of his (bleep) skull" when engaged in the process of making art. And it shows.
anon117963
Post 5
"crazy artist" makes for a convenient story.

However, as an artist with a mental illness, i do find that certain temporary states of the brain are conducive to producing better art - endurance and concentration along with the continued (dopamine) reward of new ideas developing.

Related Topics
anon117186
Post 4
Those truly insane could not produce great art. To produce great art takes an enormous amount of work and concentration. Likewise, depression and addiction do not constitute crazy.
Andre Gonzalez
Post 3
Max Beamus of Say Anything and Two Tongues has a history of bipolar/schizophrenia and depression. Had to opt out of a tour too, because of it.

Great singer/songwriter too

anon104176
Post 2
Thank you. I recently acquired the label crazy because of a music based film I did. The critic was cruel and just didn't get the story or art of the film, while others appreciated my bravery.
Related Topics
astor
Post 1
Some more scientifically based analysis of "the crazy artist" has suggested that people that because people who suffer from mental illness have abnormal brain chemistry, literal perception of the world is altered. However, a strictly scientific analysis of this tendency does not explain why people with mental illness are often drawn towards the arts. There really is no other explanation for this other than the fact that people who feel alienated actively seek outlets for strong and debilitating emotional problems. Even art that is negative in nature seems to serve as a method of escape or self-help for the artist.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously

please enter the following code:

Login

username
password
forgot password?
or connect with facebook

Register

username
password
confirm
email